Detention Girls (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month (recurring).
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 18 different sites.
-The site and the network are first class. First class in videos and photosets in technical features.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-All content is exclusive.
-Navigation is simple. Can easily change between sites. No additional re-login required.
-There are free cam shows included.
-Excellent model listing, with large thumbnail for each model.
-No download or streaming limits that I found.
-There is a simple search and an advance search. The advanced search has lots of different filters you can use.
-The quality of the photosets is excellent.
-Photosets have plenty of tags to describe the action.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in multiple definitions: 270p - 1080p.
-Photosets can be downloaded in small, medium and large definition zips (800px, 1333px, 3840px).
-This is a teen site and teen network. The models are A-list, very attractive. |
| Cons: |
-The major con is this is a small site (19 videos and matching photosets). And it's an archive site. The last update was Apr 26, 2020. I guess the Covid epidemic shut down production.
That is a shame, because the videos and photosets are high quality, with attractive teen models.
-You get basic model information: girl's age, height, country, figure (e.g., 30B-24-33), and a fake bio that bullshit. For example, the bio for Vanna Bardot reads: "Vanna Bardot is a playful teen who loves toys, boys, and anything else that'll make her tight little pussy throb. Her puffy nipples are a perfect mouthful and her braces-filled smile is the epitome of innocence. You will love this tanned toned hottie!"
The bio is obviously fake: Vanna Bardot does not have braces. I don't know where they get the idea of innocence from, because in every video I've seen at the site and network, she's hot to trot.
My guess is they make up the bios without examining any of the site videos.
-No 4K video definition. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site theme is teen girls who are being punished by being sent to a detention center.
That's the idea, but the videos and photosets only show a slight hint that the girls are at a detention center. They might sometimes wear an orange outfit, but that's about it. But the girls also wear tiny cut-off jeans, with g-string underwear, crop-top halters, for variety.
The holding cell for a girl is a large-sized bedroom, with a king-sized bed and the bedroom looks more like a nice motel room than a prison cell. You see framed photographs on the walls, nice nightstands with table lamps on either side of the bed, carpeted floors, an adjoining, individual bathroom with a toilet, large mirror, washbasin, and shower. Instead of bars, you have a doorway leading out of the bedroom that is not locked.
I guess the girls are supposed to be at high-class detention centers.
The only way to tell this is supposed to be a detention center is the site title, and the orange uniform some of the girls put on some of the time.
Some of the girls even have a pink teddy bear on their bed.
The sex is guy/girl, girl/girl, group with two or more girls, group with two or more girls with a guy, whatever.
The guards don't wear prison type clothes, but regular street clothes.
How do you know they are guards?
Because they tell the girls the girls are being bad. The girls are so horny they want to fuck. And the guards are willing to fuck the girls, after the girls plead to be fucked.
Or else, the girls try to get satisfaction with other girls (lesbian action).
In other words, the plots are basic or non-existent. "I'm horny, fuck me," says an attractive girl.
"No, don't be stupid," says the guard. "Please, I want you," says the girl.
"Well, all right," says the guard.
And they have sex.
Before the girl has sex with the guard, she might have sex with her pink teddy bear (to show you how horny she is).
Neither the script or the model has been nomimated for an academy award, or even for a Porn Star award, as far as I can tell.
I'm giving the site a score of 72.
The girls are attractive, the videos and photosets are good to excellent quality, the technical features of the site are fine. The problem is this is a small archive site with limited content.
However, you get access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network, which is 18 teen sites in all. The technical features of the network are excellent. But problem with the network is that the themes are "reality-based porn" that is so simple it's stupid. Instead of calling this "reality porn", I would say it's really a 12-year-old male's fantasy of what porn girls are like: attractive young girls who just want to have sex. There is no extreme, hardcore porn action, no domination or BDSM, just clean sex with horny young girls who want to be satisfied. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
