18 Videoz (0)
|
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Low membership price:
With a PU discount, first month is $14.95, recurs at $29.95/month.
But PU has a discounted price of $59.95/year (recurring).
-3,100+ scenes for the network.
-The network has current updates (around 2 new videos per week).
-The billing processors are Segpay, Epoch and Vendo, all trusted names.
-Network provides access to 17 sites.
-Free lifetime access for ex-members. Ex-members still get limited access to network content.
-They recently updated the login to a secure page (https). But the member pages are still not secure.
-Most content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. |
Cons: |
-Although login is now secure, the member pages are not secure.
-The homepage and video listing is out-dated. The thumbnails are small, need to be brighter and more attractive, to make the content more appealing. This is basic marketing: the videos themselves can be poor to very good, but they deserve a more appealing presentation.
-Member pages have ads on every page.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. |
Bottom Line: |
This is a teen-orientated network. Almost all the models are late teens, early 20s.
Many of them are cute or attractive.
You will find many of the same models at other teen networks like Teen Mega World, Wow network, even some at the Metart network.
There are 17 sites in the network. So the sites cover a wide range of teen niches. Most of the sites are archives that haven't updated in years.
The newer vidoes have a 4K definition download option. Videos from about 4 years old and older mainly have a 720p or 1080p download option. The videos from Jun 2009 have a resolution of 320x240p through 720x576p. The streaming for the videos prior to that date is limited to 240p or 480p.
A lot of the oldest videos are not worth watching or collecting. The problems are poor lighting, poor focus and cheap sets. The lighting is so dim in some early videos it's difficult to see what the model looks like.
The older photosets are also not worth collecting. They are screencaps, with poor lighting, poor focus, cheap sets, cheap costumes (the costumes are cheap street clothes that look like they were bought at a rummage sale). The earliest videos are even worse than the earliest videos at Teen Mega World, which also started out as a low-rent teen hardcore network, but even when Teen Mega World was starting out, with low-rent clothes, low rent settings, they still did a better job with their videos and photosets than the 18videoz network. And as time went on, the Teen Mega World network spent their profits on better lighting, better equipment, to make the videos and photosets have higher production values, so that today, the Teen Mega World videos and photosets are good to excellent, and are just a few steps below the Wow network videos and photosets. Teen Mega World is one of my favorite hardcore teen networks, just below the Wow network. The models at Wow network are among the finest looking teens on the internet, and the production values, the clear crisp videos and photosets are borderline glamour in quality and style.
For teen hardcore porn, Teen Mega World and the Wow network are my two favorite networks.
I'm giving the 18Videoz network a score of 82.
Negatives are that most of the sites stopped updating years ago.
The network only updates with 1 new video every 3 or 4 days.
The videos and photosets have improved over time. But there's too much old content that is ultra-low quality.
The low membership price is one of the strengths of the network.
But I prefer Teen Mega World network and the Wow network over the 18Videoz network.
Bottom line:
The 18Videoz network should deserve a higher score. There are some really cute models at the network. And there are some worthwhile videos to see. But there's too much trash that buries the good videos, so it's really hit or miss if you want to find the better quality videos at the network.
I've listed the 17 sites you get access to in the 18Videoz network in the first reply to this review: |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|