Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Goddess Nudes

Goddess Nudes (0)

Newbie
80*
LKLK (0) 05-02-21  02:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Simple, basic, non-glamour, softcore solo photo site.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Navigation is simple, based on this is a photoset only site (except for some "Staff Selection" videos and photosets which cost extra to download).
-You get low, medium and high definition download and online viewing of the photosets.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons: -No videos (except for the limited "Staff Selection" videos, which cost extra to download.
-The number of photos per set is surprisingly small. Often less than 50 photos in a set.
-Slow update rate. Down to about 2 sets per week. Used to be 5 sets per week, years ago.
-High membership price. Used to be $10/month or less, years ago. Then, in 2016, MetArt raised the price to $30/month or $100/year.
-No bonus sites (except for the live cam shows).
-The photos are high quality, but use a simple, basic style: solo female model, very simple indoor or outdoor setting, non-glamour. A set can start out with a girl wearing inexpensive clothes, or can start out with the girl already nude. But it's not a tease or strip, you are just viewing nude photos of the girl walking around, lying on the floor, I mean, very simple poses.
-Pre-ckecked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line: Goddess Nudes was started in 2010 by Eolake Stobblehouse, the same man who started and ran Domai for many years.
Goddess Nudes was supposed to be a slightly sexier version of Domai.
Where the girls show a bit more.
I guess I'm blasé, because I can't really tell the difference between Domai and Goddess Nudes.
Both sites seem, to me at least, to feature softcore nudity.
Both sites mainly feature solo female models, who either disrobe for the camera, or start off nude.
There are no men in the photos.
The philosophy behind both sites was the innocent enjoyment of nude women. Sharing their beauty. Their joy of living.

I think of myself as a meat and potatoes guy. Maybe a purist or connoisseur could tell the difference between the two sites. I can't tell. To me, both sites are essentially similar. The main difference is that the two sites have different names. But any content from one site could have been posted in the other site.

In the same manner, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are three different sites. Sharing many or most of the same models. Sharing many or most of the same themes: teen female nudity and sex, softcore and hardcore. The content at any one of the three sites could have been posted at the other two sites. To illustrate this point, a video posted at one site has, in the past, had the accompanying photoset (the photoset that was made during the shooting of the video) posted at the other site: For example a Wow Girls video had the photoset made during that video shoot posted at Wow Porn. And vice versa. So the sites not only shared many or most of the same models, but also shared the same themes, photographers, technical crew, etc.

The above is not a criticism of any of sites I mentioned.
Domai and Goddess Nudes are fine sites.
All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are fine sites, and the three sites are one of my favorite porn networks. Currently, the three sites are marketed as a single network: you join any one of the three sites, and you get access to all three sites. And for several months now, you also get access to Ultra Films, another fine site with the same models from what is now called the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn).
The Wow network used to be called the Diesel network years ago.

Wow network plus Ultra Films have been having a special for 6 months or more: you can join the Wow network and Ultra Films for $70/year. Which is a great price: I paid more than that for the Wow network, and I paid a separate membership fee for Ultra Films. And now you get all 4 sites for less than I was paying for Wow network. For less than what I paid for Ultra Films.

I'm sorry I'm going off-topic in this review. But if you haven't ever joined the Wow network before, or if you have but aren't a current member, I highly recommend joining the Wow network plus Ultra Films, if you can find the special discount of $70/year for the 4 sites.
That's if you are a fan of lovely young teens in hardcore action. With some softcore content, as well, but mainly hardcore action.

Going back to Goddess Nudes.
Goddess Nudes is softcore nudity.
Like Domai, Goddess Nudes is photoset only. No videos.
Let me explain about the no videos statement: there are a few videos at the site. But they are listed as "Staff Selection". This means that to download any Staff Selection video you have to pay extra to download it. The same Staff Selection videos are also posted at all the MetArt network sites. So the Staff Selection videos are a feature of the MetArt network of sites, and not basically a feature of any one individual MetArt network site.

Also, if you are a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you can download all the Staff Selection videos, without paying extra. But that's only if you are a lifetime member.
To become a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you normally have to pay $400 to $800, which is a one-time fee. Lifetime members of a site have free access to that site.
With full lifetime streaming and downloading privileges.

The same setup and features of Domai are repeated at Goddess Nudes: you get limited physical data on the models, but no bios.

The update rate used to be 5 updates per week. The same as Domai.
But like Domai, the rate has slowed to about 2 updates per week.
Most of the models are slender white girls, late teens or early twenties.

From the website, the following stats are shown:
Number of photosets: 2634
Number of models: 1143
Contributing photographers: 143
Photosets contain from 30 to 100 or more photos. But most sets are under 50 photos.

The photography is excellent, but it uses a simple, non-glamorous style: Not a lot of make-up on the models, the clothing is simple, not expensive.
You get a mix of indoor and outdoor shoots.
Strictly softcore. Solo women only photoshoots. No men allowed.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE FIRST REPLY SECTION:

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

LKLK (0) Navigation is simple and easy: All you have at the site are photosets (except for the small number of Staff Selection videos).
Photosets are dated.
There are some tags for the photosets.

In 2016, after MetArt took over running Domai and Goddess Nudes from the original owner, they raised the price from $10/month to $30/month or $100/year.
At $10/month, it was a worthwhile join.
For $30/month, or $100/year, I feel it's an expensive membership.
You can pay the same price, or a lower price, for many other fine photographic sites, or photo + videos sites.
So I would join Domai or Goddess Nudes once in a blue moon, if you have extra money to spend.
That's in spite of the model catalog of attractive to lovely young models.
My feeling is that MetArt has priced the site too high for what it offers.

If you want a softcore site, I would suggest joining MetArt.com.
That site blows both the Domai and Goddess Nudes sites out of the water.

MetArt stats:
MetArt updates with 4 (photoset + video) per day.
Number of photosets: 22544
Number of videos: 1804
Number of models: 3831
Number of photographers: 291

The models at MetArt range from merely attractive to gorgeous.
MetArt uses a more glamorous style than Goddess nudes.
The settings are more expensive, the costumes are more expensive.
MetArt is probably the finest softcore teen site on the internet.
I say teen, because that's the way MetArt started out around 1999.
But they can feature models in the twenties and even in their thirties, as well.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN NEXT REPLY:

05-02-21  02:52pm

Reply To Message

2

LKLK (0) Though few models are still active in their thirties, at this site.

I'm giving Goddess Nudes a score of 80.
There are too many other sites that give you more content for the same or a lower price.

05-02-21  02:53pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.