Nude Beach Dreams (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- About as close to exhibitionism as you can find these days on pay sites.
- Video count is in the thousands, but is misleading.
- Photos with downloadable zips (a major plus on a site like this)
- Some good exhibitionism including full sex and these are amateurs.
- I would call it a voyeur site based on most of the scenes are filmed more like the couple or group doesn't know it.
- Very fast download speeds (90% of max)
- CCBill is the biller. |
| Cons: |
- The biggest con is there are many videos on this site that are split into parts, as many as 17 (maybe more, that's the most I've seen). See bottom line.
- No dates on the scenes. The only way to tell the newer scenes are likely over the last few years is the people's iPhone 6+ or higher laying near them. That's putting in research work.
- Besides the obvious known problems with amateur models (some unattractive), there's no way to find more content of ones you like. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm pacing myself to my 500th review and thought I would try this site out. Fundamentally, there's nothing at all wrong with the site. Some of the videos are downloadable in HD. All the videos are downloadable. They have a nice section called "Albums" that has all the different photo sets of women they don't have videos of. It just has a few minor flaws.
Those split up videos are almost understandable. They are usually a Swinger Party, there are people everywhere. The split parts focus on one couple or threesome. It reminds me of watching the male stripper sites like Dancing Bear and Party Hardcore. It's hard to fault them for splitting those long scenes up to focus on a couple. One of my biggest complaints about those two male stripper sites was they took the camera off the sexiest women. But there's no way to find all the parts. And they are short videos (3-5 minutes).
I'm not going to be that rough on the score on that part. I would be complaining if they filmed 2 hour scenes and switched the camera from sexy woman to not sexy woman.
This is sex, some masturbation and some of it is just flashing/spying. I don't know where it's filmed at but I am guessing it's not in the United States.
I'm also going to guess it's near impossible to know if they are updating. There are no dates. With Covid over the last 15 months, it just seems unlikely they are. This is more like the porn sites we used to join to enjoy the hunt. That's what you're going to be doing here.
Just to show the difficulty the site creates, there is a scene I really liked titled Voyeur Sex On The Beach 55, part 03/06. They show 12 related videos over to the right but none of those are Voyeur Sex On The Beach 55, part 02, 01, 04. However, they did get a Voyeur Sex On The Beach 56 part 04/04 in the related. It reminds me of the old newsgroup websites. The search does partially work. If you search for Voyeur Sex On The Beach 55, it will bring up all the Voyeur Sex On The Beach scenes but doesn't recognize the number on the title.
Technical quality can't really be complained about. The videos are easily and quickly downloaded, even the 1080p ones. The videos have screencaps with them but those differ from the photo sets in the "Albums" section. The albums section seems to be pure voyeurism of someone taking pictures of a nude woman walking around.
With so many sites known for their exhibitionism shoots no longer shooting those types, it leaves us who like public exhibitionism looking for replacements. My score is more based on this is real exhibitionism/voyeurism, the site works well, the quality is there, the downloads are there and I think for most exhibitionism fans the attractiveness of the woman isn't the attraction. Most of these women would at worst be considered "average" looking. The sex scenes have a problem all amateur sites have. There's only one camera view. They are still good.
I just don't know if a membership is warranted unless you just want to try a relatively cheap public site for a month. I have seen worse but not many with much better, especially of amateurs. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
