Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit She Is Nerdy

She Is Nerdy (0)

Newbie
90*
LKLK (0) 06-19-21  05:45am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Site is part of the Dirty Flix network.
If you join through the She Is Nerdy site, you will pay $30/month, or $120/year.
But if you join through the Dirty Flix site directly, you can normally find discounted prices of $15/month or $60/year. I joined through Dirty Flix for $60/year. Joining through She Is Nerdy and/or Dirty Flix gives you access to the same sites.
-The videos have your choice for downloading of low, medium and high definition. And since November 2016 they added 4K definition for downloading.
But for online streaming, they stream at 240p, 720p, or 1080p. There is no 4K option for streaming, even on the newest videos.
-There is an accompanying screen shot set for each video. The zip file comes in only one definition. The screen shot sets vary between 40 to about 80 screen shots. These are screen shots, not photos.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. Unusual. I looked all over for a pre-checked cross-sale, but finally realized there wasn't any.
Cons: -On the public page, it tells you you have 5 video previews, to see what the quality of a video looks like. Except, when you click on a video preview link, instead of watching a video preview, it brings up the join page, where the prices shown are expensive: $30/month, or $120/year.
Two cons:
the prices shown are expensive.
instead of viewing a sample preview, you get the join page. Where's the sample preview? You have to join the site to see the video. Ha-ha. Joke is on you.
-The login and member pages are non-secure. Your browser will probably have a popup notice stating "This conection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
-There are no video previews in the members area. If you want to know what the video is about, you can look at the thumbnail screen shots, or you can read the generic text description which tells you a model will get fucked by a stunt cock.
Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED):
There is minimal plot to most of these videos: You have a cute girl who starts off wearing glasses (which is supposed to show she is a nerdy girl), you've got a young stunt cock who's got sex on his brain (these are Russians, remember), they touch, they kiss, then it's off to teen hardcore heaven.
-Irregular update rate. From 2 to 4 new videos per month. But if you count the accompanying screenshot sets, that means 4 to 8 new items per month.
-Verotel is the default payment processor that I used. Not as widely known as CCBill or Epoch, but a trusted name in high-risk payment processing (the classification for porn pay sites).
-There are ads on every member page, but that's standard to most porn sites.


BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Movies: 121
Photosets: 121
Models: around 121
Site launched in 2014
Videos run about 20 to 30 minutes

The photosets are screenshot sets, not photosets, since the contents of a set are screen shots. Screen shots are lower quality than photos. The definition is usually less. The focus is not as good, the composition of the image is normally less artistic.

Site theme: nerdy girls having sex.
What makes a girl nerdy? She is wearing glasses. That's all it takes. And sometimes the girls aren't even wearing glasses. You have to take the site's idea that any girl can be nerdy. And most of the girls at the site are cute teens (or early twenties) who are wet inside and ready to milk your cock with their mouth and pussy and even their ass.
Let me emphasize how cute and hot these teens are.
You would think the sex would get repetitous and boring very fast. But if you're into attractive teen girls like I am, the videos are more than watchable, they can be arousing.
The site (and most of the network) does a fine job selecting cute teen models who put on a show for you.
These girls are almost all featured at competing teen hardcore sites, like Nubiles.net, Nubiles Porn, Team Skeet, Teen Mega World, Twistys, etc. Some of them can even appear at MetArt.

The plot or setup to the sex is usually minimal. The screenshot sets are usually not worth collecting, even if the models are attractive, because the quality of the screenshot is not good or just OK. But the videos are definitely worth collecting. The models are cute, the images are clear and crisp, the video does a fine to excellent job capturing how attractive these young girls are. The models don't wear a lot of makeup, the sets are not expensive but not overly cheap, the video is like a slice of life of what you'd like to see (and do) if you were a teen or early twenties person again with one of these lovely young women. This isn't glamcore or heartcore, but it's a closer to slice of life of what you wish you had been exposed to as a young man.

Although many of the model and stunt cocks are Russian or from that region, there are some from America. So some videos do have English dialogue. But dialogue, or its lack, is a minor element in the videos. Although I enjoy plot-driven porn, especially when it's done well, any plot is a minor factor in these videos. You've got a nubile girl and a guy that wants to get his rocks off. It's not rough, crude, or over the top sex. Instead, it's two young people enjoying each other without guilt or any other baggage. Occasionally there is a touch of romance, if you want to consider kissing and holding hands romance before the hardcore sex. But the site focuses on the hardcore sex.

The site and network has a simple structure that is easy to navigate. There is a search engine, if you want to check the video for a title you've seen. There are hot links for all the model's content at the network, once you click on her name. The models themselves, as I've stated, are young white teen- or early-twenties- girls who are mainly attractive. Little effort is put into presenting them attractively, but they are naturally young and attractive to begin with: they don't need much make-up, expensive sets, glamourous costumes, or extensive lighting.

I'm giving the site a score of 90. The site focuses on teen girls who are into sex. The videos are mainly bread-and-butter hardcore sex, but I enjoy them.
If hardcore teen sex is not your niche, you would score the site lower, and would probably be bored with it. I regard the simple plots, or lack of them, as a positive, because most porn starlets are poor actors. There's no problem with a stupid plot, because there's almost no plot in these videos. You have a girl and a guy, they meet or are together, and they have sex.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to LKLK!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.