Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit 18 Flesh

18 Flesh (0)

Newbie
58*
LKLK (0) 07-11-21  07:40pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of the 18Videoz network. You get access to the entire network of 17 sites with membership in any one of the sites.
-There is a model page for each model, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show what she looks like, along with a small listing of her physical details. But there is no model listing for the site.
There's supposed to be a way to bring up a model listing for the site, but I couldn't get it to work.
-Low membership fee of $60/year, with a PU discount. Otherwise, the listed price is $120/year.
Cons: -18 Flesh is an archive site. The last update was in December 2011.
-Most of the 18Videoz sites are archive, that stopped updating years ago. So the quality of the videos is poor for most archive sites.
-Every so often your password is rejected. I don't know why. So you have to re-set it, which is easy to do.
-Login is secure. But the member pages are not secure.
-Ads on every page. The ads are thumbnails, that are not clearly defined as ads. If you click on an ad thumbnail, it brings up a new site for you to join.
-There is no text description of the video plot. Except the plot is little or nothing. You have a girl masturbating or exposing parts of her body, and a guy appears to have sex with her.
-You do have tags to describe the action, but they're almost un-nessary, because there's almost no plot, just sex.
-A lot of the girls are probably pretty teens or early twenties, but because of the poor picture quality, you can't appreciate how pretty these girls are.
Bottom Line: Videos have a runtime of around 20 minutes.
Videos have a choice of 480p or 536p. On a 27" monitor, even for the higher resolution videos, the image is slightly out of focus. On a 14" monitor (such as a laptop) the image is not as much out of focus, except that I imagine most PU members would not accept viewing these videos because of the poor quality.
So the entire 18 Flesh site would be unacceptable, unless for historical interest. Or to see videos of a favorite model that retired years ago.
-There is a photo set of each video. The photo set is made up of screenshots, not photos.
There is no way to bring up the screenshots individually on your monitor. And there is no zip file for the photo set.
Years ago the site probably had a program to view the screen shots online, and probably had a zip file for the photo sets, but the online viewing program and the zip file download option seem to have disappeared.
-There is a search function to list models at the site/network, but I couldn't get it to work: couldn't bring up any model names, that fit any age range, debut date at the site or network, or dates videos were posted at the site/network.
Conclusion: site maintenance is hit or miss, mainly missing.

Bottom line summary:
The 18 Flesh site seems like a waste of opportunity and internet space.
Due to the poor quality of the videos, the videos are basically unwatchable.
There seem to be a lot of cute girls at the site, but the poor quality videos, and the screenshots you can't view onscreen or download, along with the poor search capability, make the site worthless.

They did upgrade the login to the network, and it's now https, which is secure.
But the member pages for the site/network are non-secure.

I'm giving the site a score of 58. I found nothing at the site (videos, screen caps) worth viewing.
Actually, I couldn't view any screencaps, because all I found were montages of the screen cap photosets.
And I've found much better videos at other paysites with a 536p definition that showed what the models looked like more clearly.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to LKLK!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.