18 Virgin Sex (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Membership includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-The main draw of this site (and the network) is the level of attractiveness of the teen models: they range from cute to gorgeous. These are not glamour models, but they could have easily been featured at MetArt or Femjoy or any fine photo site. I mean, these girls are fucking impressive in how cute or lovely they are. The models are often found at Teen Mega World and 18 Videoz and other sites which have a lot of cute teens.
On average, I think the teen models at 18 Virgin Sex compare favorably with the Diesel network (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls), which is the finest collection of teen models I've ever seen for hardcore sex.
-There is a short text description of the plot/action of the video.
-The plots are simple, so they don't require much acting on the part of the model. Which is a good thing, since most teen porn stars are poor actors. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
Most models are slender white European teens. Most models have small or medium breasts. No boob jobs that I've seen yet. The girls range from attractive to extremely attractive.
I appreciate that in many of the videos I've seen, the girls act naturally: when I see or hear a girl moaning right from the start because she's touching herself, or the guy is touching her, it's a turn-off. I know it's fake. I prefer a more realistic approach, more natural acting. Not every video is a winner or a keeper. Sometimes the girl is less attractive. Sometimes she tries to put on a show of fake excitement right from the start that is too fake to believe.
But some girls are gorgeous, and they can sometimes put on a great show.
-Some of the videos appear to be exclusive. Other videos probably aren't exclusive to the site. Certainly, if you visit the porn tube sites, you've probably come across plenty of videos from the 18 Virgin Sex site. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(START OF):
-Irregular update rate. Could have 0 to 3 updates in a month for the 18 Virgin Sex site.
For the network as a whole, you might have 0 to 5 updates in a month.
-Based on the slow update rate, I would not join this site/network for more than 1 month.
Unless they changed their policies, and started sending the fresh-faced models to my house (joke- Ha-Ha).
-They don't bother to post the dates these videos/photosets were added to the site.
-There is a page of specials, which is really just advertising for other sites.
-There is a model listing.
The model listing has a small thumbnail for each model.
You can sort the model listing by:
-the entire network, or
-by the site you want to examine, or
-by the model's name, alphabetically, or
-by the model's rating (how popular she is), or
-by the model's number of scenes, or
-by the model's date. Not sure if this refers to the date the model first appeared at the site or network, or some factor in her videos or photosets. Since almost all videos and photosets show no date, you have to take this sorting-factor on faith. It's a worthless factor to sort by.
And the model's popularity is also a worthless factor to sort by.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Did you ever wonder what it's like to fuck a virgin?
At 18 Virgin Sex, you get to see cute, nubile girls (18 years old, as shown by their birth certificate, which is mailed to you personally, once you send in your $1,000 US dollar certified bank check), getting fucked for the first time.
It only takes another $1,000 US dollars for a certificate signed by a respected European medical doctor ceritifying the girl's virginity before the sex act is performed on her.
For an additional $19,999.99 US dollars and cents, the girl herself will appear at your doorstep, and you can sample her wares, to send you into heavenly bliss, without the assistance of any drugs. If drugs are needed, due to your old age, apply to your health care provider.
The main negative for the site (and network) is the slow update rate. You have around 35 sites
in the network you gain access to with a membership in 18 Virgin Sex. But you only get anywhere from 0 to 5 updates per month. I mean 5 new videos per month max (along with the matching photosets) for the network. The 18 Virgin Sex site updates with 0 to 3 videos per month.
-Photosets run around 60 - 160 photos per set.
You can view the photos in a slide show, or download the set in a zip file.
You can select the time interval for the slide show from 5 seconds to 25 seconds.
The zip file downloads with a generic filename, "zip_photos.zip", which you have to re-name to show the models name, set title, site. There's no posting date for the photoset.
There's only one definition for the zip file: no choice of low, medium and high definition.
The photos in a photoset are low quality: since many of the girls are attractive to extremely attractive, they really deserve a better quality photoset. Even girls you know to be very attractive lose much of the attractive quality because the photos don't showcase how lovely they can be. The videos do a better job capturing the models. Which is the opposite of what a glamour photo site does: glamour photo sites normally present the models most attractively in their photos, with the model coming across as less attractive in their videos, since it's much easier to photoshop a photo versus photoshopping a video.
My best guess is that the photo sets are low-quality screen caps made from the video.
I've seen other teen sites that make much better, more attractive photosets from their videos from a software program.
And that's a shame: because some of the models at 18 Virgin Sex (and the network) are really attractive; and many of the rest of the models, while less attractive, are still worth looking at. So it's a wasted opportunity using attractive models but giving the members such poor-looking screen cap photosets.
The girls are usually playing themselves without a lot of over-the-top screams or other noises to illustrate how fake-excited they are.
Videos run around 15 minutes.
The site has 425 videos.
Plus matching photosets (or maybe I should call them screencap sets).
You can rate the videos, and add them to a favorites list.
Each video has a brief text description of the plot/action, and a very small number of tags describing the action.
The text plot description can be wrong: I think the people who wrote the plot descriptions didn't bother to watch the videos they were describing. And the tags can be misleading, as well.
Example:
The text description for a video is as follows:
"Erika Korti's boyfriend is away from her for some time already. Thanks to modern technologies they chat with each other every day. They even discuss their sexual fantasies online. Sure, such conversations turn on the hottie to the limit. She takes off her clothes to caress her beautiful tits, flat tummy, long legs, and wet pussy.
CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW: |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
