Give Me Teens (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Give Me Teens is a channel in the Adult Time network.
Years ago it used to be part of the Devils Film/Fame Digital network.
My best guess is that it still is part of Devils Film; if you go to the site: givemeteens.com,
the page shows "Devil's Film presents Give Me Teens".
Joining Give Me Teens, or Devils Film, gives you access to Adult Time network.
And vice versa: joining Adult Time gives you access to Devils Film and Give Me Teens.
And in the Adult Time website, Give Me Teens has the text "Part of devilsfilm".
-The channel has videos dating back to 2006, so you can find porn stars when they were first starting out.
-The site is a smorgasbord of teen, boy/girl, 3-somes, lesbian, cocksucking, vaginal and anal sex, with plenty of young/old sex as well. |
| Cons: |
-The earliest videos were low-rent videos filmed in 240p and 480p definition.
-Cheap sets, mainly unattractive models, stupid or unimaginative dialog, poor acting, makes watching most of these videos a waste of time.
I would far rather watch well-produced videos with attractive models. Why waste time on crap?
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. |
| Bottom Line: |
Give Me Teens stats:
Videos: 1412
Video runtime: averages around 35 minutes.
Normally, I give any chanel in the Adult Time network a score in the 90s, because of the vast amount of hardcore content covering a wide variety of niches, and because most of the content is good to very good.
However, the models at Give Me Teens are not very attractive.
The models at the Wow/Diesel sites are far superior in looks. The models at many teen sites are far more attractive.
The plots are stupid, the dialog is stupid, the acting is poor.
In my opinion, the Adult Time network would be improved if they deleted the Give Me Teens channel.
Why keep low quality crap like the Give Me Teens channel?
Adult Time has thousands of teen-oriented videos apart from the Give Me Teens channel, so there's no need for over 1,000 videos featuring almost entirely unattractive teens with stupid plots, stupid dialog, poor acting.
I do admit there are a few attractive teens at the channel.
But slogging through the junk to find the attractive teens is not worth the effort.
When the site first started out, and for a few years afterwards, they did put effort into using attractive teens. But those early videos are only available in 240p and 480p definition, and most PU members wouldn't watch such low-definition videos. They would require 1080p or higher.
Edit: I'm being hard on this site. If you enjoy watching porn that reminds you of your first experience with porn videos, this site might give you some nostalgia value: the sets seem cheap, the acting is atrocious, the models look like porn stars (not a compliment). But I remember watching Emmanuelle, the French softcore porn movie around 1974, and Story of O around 1975. The images for those movies were clear and crisp, the colors vivid, and they were shown in regular movie theaters, not porno movie theaters. Porn was suddenly gaining acceptance, beyond the low-grade shit shown in home movies.
The internet gives you access to quality porn, with high production values, and attractive to beautiful models.
The Give Me Teens site is low quality porn. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
