Sinful Raw (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the Adult Prime network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. You don't have to pay extra for any premium sites.
-Video definition is 540p through 4K.
-Zip file for the photoset of the video.
-High production values: Even though the site specializes in shooting dark videos and photosets (are they trying to save electric bills?), the costumes are expensive, the sets are expensive, the background music is tasteful, there is ample use of oils for sensuous massages and sensual fucking. |
| Cons: |
-Small site. Only 19 videos (plus matching photosets).
-Slow update rate.
-Captcha required for login.
-Pre-checked cross-sales on join pages. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Video content: 19 videos.
-Video runtime: averages around 30-32 minutes.
-Photosets: 19 photosets.
-Photosets run around 134 photos per set.
Site theme: Sex is sinful. Forget that sex is needed to make children, which is God's plan to replentish the earth after adults die. The site shows how people with twisted desires are having all kinds of dirty, evil sex: Blowjobs, pussy eating, masturbation, handjobs, pussy fingering, orgies, bondage, this site shows how men and women can cheat on their partners, and fall into temptation while doing the devil's work. There's also vaginal and anal sex.
The site features videos with not only dark themes, but dark lighting as well.
You have boy/girl sex, threesomes, one guy with multiple girls, lots of oil to make the naked bodies glisten with passion.
This is stylized glamcore. Trying for an aesthetic vision of raw, sinful sex.
I'm repeating myself, but I saw Emmanuelle (1974), the French softcore movie with Sylvia Kristel, and Story of O (1975), also a French softcore movie. Both of those movies had a visual and emotional impact that was undeniable. I believe the 1970s was the golden age of porn (except that the internet in the 1990s and beyond has also produced a huge amount of high quality softcore and hardcore content).
The great thing about Emanuelle and Story of O was the plot made sense, the acting was acceptable to good, the models/actors were extremely attractive, the colors and images were crisp and clear. I bought DVDs of those 2 movies from Amazon, and the DVDs were degraded copies of the original movies. A shame. Because those 2 movies were impressive.
Sinful Raw videos and photos use dark lighting to try to make the scenes erotic and sensual.
The sex is supposed to be sinful.
I think the stylized approach of the site is pretentious.
I appreciate the simpler style of Massage Rooms, where the scenes are more brightly lit, so you can see the models more clearly. I mean, if you have attractive models, let me see them.
Except that the models at Sinful Raw are not the most attractive models you've ever seen: so maybe the darkness helps to hide the blemishes, age wrinkles, whatever, and your imagination is supposed to be fired into thinking these are godesses who are getting fucked.
Except my imagination is limited, and I prefer the Massage Rooms videos, where I can see the lovely models, and see them getting massaged sensually, and then getting fucked sensually. Or getting fucked energetically. But let me see and admire and crave the bodies of lovely young models, instead of squinting in the dark to see what the model looks like.
Maybe they should have the models fucking in a dark closet. Then I could use my imagination, instead of trying to see what the models look like. To see what the models are supposed to be doing. I know they are supposed to be doing naughty things, but it would help to be able to see the naughty things they are doing in the dark.
Pure Taboo, a site in the Adult Time network, often uses dark lighting, which is also supposed to heighten the erotic mood. But Sinful Raw goes overboard with the darkness, and you often can't see what the performers look like, or what they are supposed to be doing.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
It's a tiny site. Currently 19 videos and matching photosets.
The idea of stylized hardcore glamour is good, but they go overboard with the darkness.
The videos show high technical qualities, except you can't clearly see the models because it's too fucking dark.
I much prefer Pure Taboo, a competing site from a competing network. Pure Taboo is probably the finest story-driven hardcore site on the internet. The Sinful Raw site videos don't have much of a story: you see models fucking, and you're supposed to think there's some story behind the fucking. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
