Review Replies (5)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Thanks for the review. I'd heard from them back in JUNE last year -- as in, like, 6 months ago -- that they were going to regularly have larger pics than 1024s by September or so. Your review confirms that it wasn't so. I really feel like I was bs'ed by them. It's something I won't forget.
|
01-09-08 04:50pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Karup (0)
Webmaster
|
congestus, thank you for the review. Regardless of what "Drooler" has said, I promise that the revamp is just around the corner. It will greatly improve navigation and I'm sure you'll be pleased by it. I invite you to contact me in 6-8 weeks either here or at jeff [at] karupspc dot com and I'll be happy to give you a membership on the house to let you see the improvments for yourself.
Drooler, sorry to disappoint you my friend, but we have better things to do than "BS" you. KarupsPC is over 10 years old. It's a monster site that was created long before there were so many of the great perks that many adult sites come with these days. Revamping it from the ground up is a project I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy. Unfortunately, there have been several obstacles on the way that have set us back. After an incredibly long road, we're almost at the finish line.
I reached out to you via e-mail several months ago and was a complete gentleman, showing you the respect you seem to have earned on this site. You never replied. Funny how you were quick to ignore my efforts to prove we could improve our score in your opinion, but when somebody writes something new on here, you're the first to chime in with your negativity and claim we "BS'd" you.
Jeff / EENT, Inc.
|
01-09-08 07:17pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Karup :
Try putting yourself in my position. Wouldn't you feel let astray by a statement that the site revamp was supposed to be ready by Sept of last year and then it wasn't? I don't think there's anything about that that's hard to get.
It's now quite near 5 months since Sept. So how have I been "quick" to ignore your efforts?
You continue to make promises, and I look forward to seeing them fulfilled. And don't forget what I posted as a comment on behalf your site, my having had faith in it and in you.
I have my reasons also for not accepting private emails from webmasters -- any webmasters, not just you. I want all of the discussion to be on this site for all to see, so when I won't, for example, be getting free membership offers when, incidentally, I'm also being asked to raise my score on a site. You know what I'm talking about? I think you might.
It also doesn't matter if you call yourself a complete gentleman. It only matters if other people say that about you. Furthermore, I don't believe a "complete" gentleman would go to the lengths that you have here to portray a reviewer at PornUsers as you have of me here ("negativity," etc.).
Other reviewers and users may wish to take note of this.
I'll be keeping my eyes open for the revamp that you say is coming, just the same.
|
02-28-08 08:33am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Karup (0)
Webmaster
|
REPLY TO #3 - Drooler :
Hi Drooler,
The new members area went online earlier this week. We haven't contacted the review sites to get re-reviews just yet because we wanted to take a week of hearing back from members, working out any kinks, etc... before we did that.
Please e-mail me at - jeff at karup dot com. I'd like to give you a complimentary user/pass to the site, just as I've offered several people on here, to check it out for yourself.
Regards,
Jeff
|
02-28-08 08:54am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Karup :
Well, seeing how others are getting complimentary memberships which might lead to new and perhaps more favorable reviews, I'll pass on the offer and wait to see what others say about it.
I can wait, after all, and the reasons I think are by now self-explanatory.
Thanks, just the same.
|
02-28-08 09:40am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
