Review Replies (4)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
sinner (0)
|
Which all is all correct from Diggler.Waste of time and your cash. Yes, also add that they tend to get you on messenger - your email and then no reponse comes out of it or they try to lead you on with money scams. How they get ya is you sign up as free and then "you want to join", as to looking at the message etc they left for ya and "blam" got ya! Then you wasted your money on this site. Most all is one sentence bs and on profile "Tell you later" all the way down. Mainly get age,gender,from on there. At the top you get there preferences on top what they looking for. They snag up - others profiles from other sites and add any race,sexual preference and spice it up.New members or paid for members "They will get a fake person to do a profile locally for you." Try to reply to them, they mess with ya or don't respond. As I got from this is trash and scam.
If you like cam sex to chatting, you are better off getting a free site on one of the engines like yahoo etc.Trying for a hook up do the same also look else where.You will kick yourself in the butt if you join.
|
04-15-07 11:20am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
dakwon (0)
|
What a joke! I'm not even sure where to start! They shouldn't have the right to call them self an adult site for many reasons. i had almost been there for a week when i got an email for them rejecting a picture of my penis, i was told more than one story of why it was rejected. First it was well you can have it but it can't be 50% of the picture, then i was told you can have it but it can't be hard, well which is it? and if it's an Adult site as you claim why would it matter either way? As i contiued to investigate i came to the conclusion that there does and don't only pretain to MEN. You have women on there showing what ever anyway you can think and they have no problem with that! I saw women with cum in there mouth, dripping down there mouth, penises in there mouth and every where else, but that's fine, i have women in my black book where 50% if not all of the picture is either tits or ass, but that is fine. Seems to be the only problem is if a man post a picture of a erect penis, not sure how that applies to a woman as of yet? I'm not sure how many men work there but everyone i spoke to was a women including the supervisor, who couldn't answer one question i had, just if i don't like it leave! I asked why did the rules only seem to deny men she said can a women get hard? my thing was once a man pulls his pants down your picture will be rejected we don't have tits so what else can i show? and why on earth would a woman what to only see a penis if it's not erect? And the women they are protecting are only there well over 50% of them are only there to steal there customers and drag them to there own personal site, as the someone already said if you get an email back it's likely to be a girl asking you to join them in there private room. It's not an adult site and it's not for men! AssHoles
|
02-16-08 04:53am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
stargazinc (0)
|
http://www.online4love.com is the primary way my husband and I meet likeminded "friends with benefits." There's no uncomfortable wondering if you ought to approach someone, you already know upfront when you meet them, and it is definitely worth the extra cost of becoming silver/gold imo, so you can exchange notes or pics before meeting and make sure its a good fit.
My hubby is str8 and I am bi and we have had no problem finding partners on online4love.com. We've had fun sex with lots of single men, single women and full swap couples that we met on O4L. And yes, I'm real, and no, I don't work for O4L or think they're perfect (they can be pricey and they goober up email sometimes,) but I think they're the best thing going by far for meeting other people who just want to have sex without strings!
For those complaining about the cost—ok, I agree, but I think you get what you pay for. I pretty much don't write people unless I can see what they look like and all, not because I'm shallow or a snob but because I want to know THEY'RE for real too and don't trust blank profiles...can you blame me? Also, it can be risky to contact people to swing with! Are they my boss? My brother? Twice my age? You get my drift. I’d like to know who I’m initiating a conversation with! The extra cost put into a good profile helps narrow down those you want to meet. How long do you pause on a profile that does not show a picture? (Faces can always be “smudged” until you know each other better to avoid embarrassing compromises.) And, although we are admittedly "just after recreational sex", part of having fun is that we have to LIKE our bedpartners too, so we look for things like a sense of humor and easygoing fun nature and a “click”. (And more expensive memberships include more matching criteria and stuff, too to help the odds of getting that “click” without too much searching.) So I guess I'm saying that if you don't cough up the extra cash for a full membership, don't expect overwhelming responses. There are lots of people who post their pictures and info, so when looking for people it's easy to breeze by the ones that don't. We may miss out on meeting some great people because of it...but we meet lots of great people too.
I agree there’s a high ratio of men to women, but I don’t know why that surprises anyone. Seems expected to me—although many women love sex, there do seem to be a lot more guys that are ok with swinging or casual sex than girls, for whatever reasons, and that’s not specific to O4L.
I definitely vote that it is worth the time and the money! We've had many a fun night of frolic thanks to connections we made on O4L. :)
|
03-12-08 06:19pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
DigglerFL (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - stargazinc :
This is clearly a spam "reply". It would be good to have a way to report such things.
|
03-16-08 08:01am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
