| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Clement's Reply
Now that I've been on the site awhile I have to reject your answer on the blurry videos. I've seen some of the videos on here on other sites at much higher quailty. What, did you buy lower res CDs than they did? And why are the clip pictures clear but the videos can't get close to that clarity? Clearly they've just been encoded at a lower res, probably for a day when not many people had broadband. You just haven't chosen to re-encode the CDs for modern viewing.
If you're going to use the high number of videos you have as a selling point, keeping them up to date should go hand and hand with that. I don't expect in 2010 to have 3/4 of the videos with 2005 download resolutions.
|
02-28-10 09:15am
|
Reply
2
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
If you're rating a restaurant and the waitress gets your order wrong and brings you the wrong thing and then tells you "oh, we were out of what you ordered so we gave you something else", do you give the restaurant a good rating because what they brought you wasn't terrible?
No, you give them 1 star. Because you want to get what you ordered; not something else. 50 is the lowest rating. The rating recommendations say "Not Recommended" is 50-59. If it was 1 video that was missing I'd give a higher rating. But there are a lot of them. So you search, find something you want, and then BANG, its "Coming Soon". Its a waste of time as well as annoying.
Its purposeful deceipt. So they get the lowest possible rating. The unavailable videos should be taken out of the index; for both members and would-be members.
|
02-24-10 04:10am
|
Reply
3
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Clement's Reply
Offering a refund so you can continue to deceiver others doesn't seem like a worthy trade off. How about if I eat the $18. and see if you
1) Change your site so it no longer indicates that videos that aren't currently available are available
2) put up the videos in 2 weeks like you indicate they will be.
Then perhaps I'll consider changing my review. In the meantime, everyone who reads this has no idea which videos are available and which aren't by the current way you're doing things.
The argument that they're being re-encoded doesn't satisfy the reasoning behind bogusly indicating that the videos are available before you pay. It should say Coming Soon BEFORE people pay as well as after.
Otherwise you are a crook, no matter how hard you try to convince yourself otherwise.
|
02-22-10 04:36pm
|
Review
4
|
VideosZ
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Updated: |
03-10-10 08:51am (Update History)
Reason: Final conclusions
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content
Newer Videos have good quality |
| Cons: |
-False Advertising
-Many videos not available at all
-They seem to buy videos that no-one else wants - too many chicks that aren't all that attractive
-"New" Releases are often videos that are 10 years old.
-Too many scenes are poor quality even on high quality download
-I hate their flash viewer
-you have to frequently log back in |
| Bottom Line: |
I was a member of this once before, so I guess its my fault for giving them another chance. I found something on this site that I'd been trying to find for a while, and the "Free Preview" shows that its available for download. After joining, it shows "Coming Soon" which basically means "sorry charlie, we fooled you".
A large number of videos are not available. You waste tons of time finding something and then find out its not available. Or sometimes the quality is so bad its not worth watching. Their "New Releases" are new only to the site. On March 1, 2010 College Girls Do 4, a video from 1999 was presented as new. Do I want to see Julie Meadows before she got her boobs done? I guess they get better deals buying old videos that nobody else wants. There's no way to sort on ACTUAL release date. So you have to sift through all of the old garbage. Virtually none of their "new" releases are new.
Their viewer will not allow you to advance the playhead past whats been downloaded. If you do, it terminates and you have to start over. This means you can't jump past the interview or the masturbation or whatever. A real time waster.
If you buy the argument that our most valuable asset is time, this site wastes more of your time than any other I've been on. You search for something you want, and then you find out its "Coming Soon". There is so much garbage; so many unattractive women, that it takes a long time to find anything really good. Then you find out that the video was encoded 5 years ago and the quality is unwatchable. Or if you find something and you don't feel like watching 10 minutes of ass-licking you can't jump past it in their viewer.
They still have login problems. You'll be navigating around and
for no apparent reason you'll get the invitation to join page.
Another time waster and annoyance.
They get the lowest score mainly because they falsely present videos on the preview that are not available when you pay. Cheats get the lowest score. Otherwise I'd give them high 50s, mainly because they don't have real new releases, and because 2/3 of their content is encoded in low quality.
*** UPDATE ***
My month is just about up now, so I wanted to report 2 things:
1) All 3 of the videos I was interested in when I first joined are still not available, despite Clement's claim that they would be done in 2 weeks.
2) They are still advertising the videos as being available before you log in only to be Coming Soon once you do log in. So clearly they are comfortable baboozling people and they think they make more money with such a practice than they do with an honest approach.
I'm very comfortable giving them the lowest possible rating. So I guess we're even.
*** Final Update ***
None of the videos that I was interested in that were tagged "Coming Soon" when I joined was availabe on the last day of the membership. So don't believe them when they tell you it will be available in 2 weeks. Its just not the truth. |
|
02-21-10 02:09pm
Replies (15)
|
Review
5
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of Content
- Some very hot sites
- Good Variety of girls |
| Cons: |
-Poor quality video (no HD or DVD quality)
-Not enough updates
-Spam Central |
| Bottom Line: |
This network has some good scenes, but there are a lot of sites and only 1 update per day for the entire network. So if you really like 2 or 3 sites, you might only get a couple of updates per month for those sites. The video quailty is very 2003, although they seem to have removed the DRM.
One thing to note is DO NOT use a real email (create a bogus one in yahoo to get your receipt), as the spam will start coming soon after signing up. I'd give them a higher rating but I hate spammers. As if paying for this low-quality stuff isn't enough that they have to sell your information also.
This site is the old in-out; watch what you like and cancel. |
|
01-14-09 05:32am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
6
|
Mega Cock Cravers
(0)
|
|
01-07-09 09:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
7
|
Mr Big Dick's Hot Chicks
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good Content with hot chicks
- Some attempt at a story line
- a lot of scenes |
| Cons: |
- Hardly any updates
- Poor Quality Videos
- Best quality is flash, which are not savable |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is part of a large package (Allrealitypass) and there is only 1 update for the entire package per weekday (none on weekends). The quality is not HD and all but the most recent movies are very low quality.
I have a particular problem with sites that have better quality trailers than the actual movies. It seems like an obvious effort to deceive, and thats always a negative. The truth is, once you've hit the archives there's really nothing to keep you wanted to renew here. Another 1 month wonder. |
|
12-07-08 06:46am
Replies (1)
|
Review
8
|
Big Tits At School
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Good Quality
- Reality Settings
- Some hot scenes |
| Cons: |
- Too many Overstuffed girls
- Too many 28yos trying to pass as teens
- Same girls over and over |
| Bottom Line: |
Part of the Brazzer's network, this particular site just doesn't do it for me. I guess I just don't get the obvious implant thing, but they need more Amy Reids and less overstuffed slut-types. |
|
10-09-08 05:19am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
9
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well if they "decided" to scale back on their content, then they need to scale back on their pricing as well. If Mercedes decided to cut back on leather and AC, you'd expect them to adjust their price accordingly.
The value test is not necessarily how good something is, its how good it is compared to what you can get spending your money elsewhere. Dollar for dollar, this site is simply not worth the price, because you can get more and better content elsewhere for less money.
|
10-05-08 05:12am
|
Review
10
|
1 By Day
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great Quality
- Unique Content
- Not your typical Scenese
- Fast Downloads |
| Cons: |
- Hardly any hardcore
- Ridiculously bad navigation
- Too much weird stuff |
| Bottom Line: |
Basically, this is an overpriced masturbation site with a sprinkling of hardcore. If you're into good looking women sticking ax handles and gun barrels into themselves then you'll probably give this a better score than me. But in one full week, there was not one new hardcore scene. There's just not enough desirable content to justify the high price.
I'm did this review 1 week into the subscription, and now I'm updating at the end. At this point I feel that this site was a complete waste of money. After pouring throught the archives, there are perhaps only 4 scenes I'd consider exceptional. Way overpriced for 80% masturbation.
I'm editing this again. I created a yahoo mail account just for this purchase. I went in to view my receipt and the mailbox is filled with porn spam. So do not give your real email to these people. |
|
10-04-08 05:35am
Replies (4)
|
Review
11
|
Pornstars Like It Big
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- good quality
- good range of women
- good download speeds |
| Cons: |
- not so believable reality
- too many average looking girls |
| Bottom Line: |
Its not terribly believable that women who fuck big cocks for a living are going to go nutty over yet-another big cock, so it beats the old striptease and then guy-comes-in-room-for-sex type of scene. You won't find too many great ones, but several are very hot. |
|
09-24-08 02:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
12
|
Teens Like It Big
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Hot girls
- great quality
- fast downloads
- true reality |
| Cons: |
- Silly dialogue |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a very hot sequence of scenes featuring mostly gorgeous girls going gaga over big cocks. While its hot for them to say "its soooo big", they don't really need to say it 15 times. They overdo it a bit, but the scenes are great. |
|
09-24-08 02:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
13
|
Brazzers
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of Content
- Good Download Speeds
- High Quality Videos
- True Reality |
| Cons: |
- Site design could use some work
- too many B rate and below chicks
- too many big fake boobs
- SPAM city |
| Bottom Line: |
The Brazzer's network has a lot of good content but after a couple of weeks you'll run out of things you want to see. There's a handful of hot girls and a lot of bad ones, unless you're into old or fat chicks.
I had to log in every time I visited the site, which was highly annoying. It also required a re-login while navigating after logging in occasionally. Luckily their CAPTCHA doesn't work (simply leaving it blank works fine), so its not as annoying as it could be.
I started to get a TON of spam right after signing up for this service. Luckily I use a bogus yahoo address. I suggest you do the same if you don't want to get buried in SPAM. |
|
08-04-08 08:40am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
14
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Mayvary's Reply
I'm a professional photographer, and you're obviously some horny dude who has probably never seen a real women naked. So who is incompetent?
You can't download just the photos you want in high resolution. You have to download the entire tarball. Or at least you did when I wasted my money on the site.
|
05-31-08 08:48am
|
Reply
15
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Mayvary's Reply
Clearly you know nothing about modeling or photography. The photos are amateurish and the models aren't models because they don't know how to pose. Most of the sets don't have a single quality shot. Its a site for horny losers. 97 implies that it could not be better, which is clearly not the case.
|
05-17-08 03:14pm
|
Reply
16
|
Fling.com
(0)
|
Reply of
stargazinc's Reply
This is clearly a spam "reply". It would be good to have a way to report such things.
|
03-16-08 08:01am
|
Review
17
|
Restrained Elegance
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- good amount of content
- daily updates
- glamour bondage only |
| Cons: |
- poor quality videos
- most of the "new" material is useless
- the break one "scene" up and call it multiple updates
- same models over and over
- videos don't work in Safari |
| Bottom Line: |
The point of bondage with hot women is to arouse sexuality, and most of the content on this site doesn't. Many of the "scenes" just seem half-baked; not enough "real" bondage. The videos are grainy and don't work in Safari. The photography isn't very good, and most of the photo sets don't have one really good photo. It just seems half-baked; like they are going through the motions to generate content without having any real ideas as to how to entertain their clientele. |
|
03-16-08 07:59am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
18
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Mayvary's Review
Is this a plant? Fess up. 97? Surely you jest.
|
02-25-08 09:41am
|
Reply
19
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Bletch's Comment
This is one of my peeves about BangBros in general. All of their "sites" say "access to ALL of our sites". But its just not the case.
|
02-16-08 07:04am
|
Review
20
|
Ox Pass
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of Content
- Decent Download Speed
- Regular Updates |
| Cons: |
- Medium Quality video
- Repetitive Story lines
- Too many mediocre-looking chicks
- Started to get a lot of porn SPAM after joining
- Same dudes and chicks over and over |
| Bottom Line: |
I suppose the rude, low-class style is intended, but if you don't like skanky chicks this may not site for you. The same guys with the same mediocre girls gets old fast. The price isn't bad, and the updates are regular, but because of the diversity of the sites, its likely that only 2 or 3 of them will appeal to any given customer. Also note that you'll get an offer to remain for $19.99 when you cancel, so you might as well cancel during the first month to save some $$$ if you intend to stay. |
|
02-16-08 06:47am
Replies (0)
|
Review
21
|
MC Nudes
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of Content
- Good Quality Images
- Fast Downloads
- Nice Layout |
| Cons: |
- Lousy Photography
- Disappointing Model Quality
- Can't download just the photos you like |
| Bottom Line: |
For the price of a full fledged porn site, you can see a bunch of amateur girls who can't pose to save their lives. You'd think in the silicone age a nude photography site would have more women with outstanding boobs; but the pickings are slim. Some of the shoots are so embarrassing that there isn't one decent pose. When shooting nudes, its important to control body lines. Most of the sessions are just a bunch of shots with no apparent plan. Lastly, you have to download the entire tarball in order to get the full-sized images, and then its a pain to find the one you wanted. |
|
02-06-08 12:46pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
22
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
12-25-07 12:21pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
23
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
OUMarcus's Comment
I find the "new" sites completely useless. VIP has been part of the "Milfhunter" network for a long time.
|
12-03-07 06:42am
|
Reply
24
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Reply
So your argument is that because its better than sites that really, really suck, its a 95? 90s ratings imply the site is the best that it can be. There's no HD or DVD quality content, slow downloads (VERY slow when you reviewed it) and an archaic password scheme. At least read what the ratings mean. A 95 implies that you don't think the site can be improved. The fact that they completely revamped the interface and got more bandwidth AFTER your review implies that even Reality Kings didn't agree with you, or they wouldn't have bothered.
|
11-21-07 08:57am
|
Reply
25
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Review
I assume you've never been on any modern porn sites? Giving a site with so many problems a 95 is just plain irresponsible.
|
11-16-07 05:58am
|
