Review Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
DigglerFL (0)
|
I assume you've never been on any modern porn sites? Giving a site with so many problems a 95 is just plain irresponsible.
|
11-16-07 05:58am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
mediafan (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - DigglerFL :
I really have not had problems with the MILF Hunters sites, At least this site allows you to download pics and movies in the full form. If you think I'm not up and up on the ratings, think again. Some sites that I joined that were rated high, were over rated by the user/poster....up dates once a week, or small videos, no pics to download. I have been with this site for over 9 months and it has improved giving now full videos compaired to clips. I don't know where you got or who gave you the idea this site gave me so much problems. As for the rating it it is my opinion.
|
11-20-07 05:38pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
DigglerFL (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - mediafan :
So your argument is that because its better than sites that really, really suck, its a 95? 90s ratings imply the site is the best that it can be. There's no HD or DVD quality content, slow downloads (VERY slow when you reviewed it) and an archaic password scheme. At least read what the ratings mean. A 95 implies that you don't think the site can be improved. The fact that they completely revamped the interface and got more bandwidth AFTER your review implies that even Reality Kings didn't agree with you, or they wouldn't have bothered.
|
11-21-07 08:57am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
