Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Naked News

Naked News (0)

messmer (0) 07-26-08  01:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Not for those who get easily bored!

I just finished a six month subscription to this site. Nostalgia made me do it because I remembered its earliest days when the novelty of naked women reading actual news made you gasp and when the anchor (Victoria Sinclair for the most part) would strip slowly and sensuously from business suit to very sexy lingerie, including nylons and garter belt, down to buff.

I found out very quickly that times had changed (along with subscribers' tastes?) because many times once that jacket came off the newsreader (model) would already be nude underneath, or, if you were lucky there might be a pair of panties or bra to get rid off. Commentators, too, were often fully nude right from the start.

The question is how often can one look at a limited pool of (admittedly) beautiful newspersons displaying their shaved pubes without getting bored. After only a few weeks I actually found myself watching the news more than the models and during my entire six month subscription I doubt I watched the show more than three weeks' worth altogether.

There should be more lingerie, more stripping, more variety in both rather than this confounded modern trend of getting to nude as quickly as possible. I realize it's a bit of a challenge for a model to strip and read the news at the same time but in its early days the site did manage to do just that.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (8)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Toadsith (0) I agree wholeheartedly that if you join this site for the nudity, you'll get bored and bored fast. It is the same models standing around naked day after day. However, I do like the site for its news content and the personalities of the models presenting it. I personally don't have access to normal TV news - though when I do I find that is uniquely terrible - and NPR just depresses me. The programming on Naked News is too short - I'd prefer 1 hour shows - but I find they are rather balanced and cover a lot of European news that you just don't get to hear about in normal American TV news (and yes, they are Canadian, but they obviously cater to the American market heavily). It is a niche genre, but they do it quite well so I don't mind supporting them.
07-27-08  01:24pm

Reply To Message

2

messmer (Disabled) REPLY TO #1 - Toadsith :

Hi Toadsith, I agree that if you don't have access to normal TV News, Naked News might be a very appealing alternative even though you don't really get enough of it. However the price is certainly right. :-) Another thing I appreciated was that, for obvious reasons, they reserved the serious stories for the beginning of the show and had the tact to wait with undressing until they moved on to a lighter subject. At first it bothered me to see emotionally charged news stories on this site at all, but if the ladies on CNN can grin and smile and banter just before and after they report on earthquakes and famine and genocides, then Naked News' offense is small by comparison.

But to return to my remarks, I have more than ten news channels I can watch, some like the CBC in Canada are even quite good and balanced, I also get massive doses of news on the Internet so, for me it was the stripping ladies and nothing but the stripping ladies that attracted me to NN. :-) And there I felt let down because they didn't strip the way they used to but became quite efficient at getting naked in a hurry!

BTW, I agree with someone's (might have been yours) remarks that the site should not even be listed here because it does not contain porn. Even to list it under "soft porn" would be an exaggeration, in my opinion.

07-28-08  11:00am

Reply To Message

3

dracken (0) I've been considering this site fo0r a while now, but hearing that the models don't really strip a lot but rather get naked pretty fast makes it drop lower on my list of places to visit. Are the news at least well presented?
08-10-09  03:47am

Reply To Message

4

messmer (Disabled) REPLY TO #3 - dracken :

Hi dracken, actually the news readers were quite capable when I still subscribed to the site but because the daily broadcast was split up into various segments like entertainment and sports and commentary there was not enough news if anyone wanted to use this site as one of their source of the latest happenings.

Naked News was a good idea at the time and caused quite a stir because of its outrageous idea of presenting the news naked but I really believe that, over the years, it became no more than a ho-hum site that made no further attempts to innovate and the models got lazy as well and got down to the buff entirely too fast! :-)

08-10-09  09:23am

Reply To Message

5

dracken (0) REPLY TO #4 - messmer :

Ha ha, good description that cleared all my confusion about this site. I had heard about it a while back and then I thought it disappeared or something. This cleared things up. Thanks for sharing.
08-11-09  02:51am

Reply To Message

6

Capn (0) When I was a member a couple of years back I kicked off about the lack of proper stripping. It was largely ignored.

I have resubscribed, there does seem to be more stripping now & a couple of the new anchors are hot. Still not enough stripping IMO

Cap'n. :0)

09-06-09  07:49am

Reply To Message

7

messmer (Disabled) REPLY TO #6 - Capn :

Sigh!!! There's never enough stripping, anywhere .. for me. The tease element has largely gone out of Porn. Younger users are impatient, they want to get to nekkid and the action as quickly as possible.
09-06-09  09:26am

Reply To Message

8

Capn (0) REPLY TO #7 - messmer :

I suppose it may be an age thing.

More geared to the world we were brought up in than our chronological age though, I think.

It is still a woefully undersupported niche.

09-06-09  09:41am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.