Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Teen Dreams (0)

Newbie 85* Wittyguy (0) 02-24-09  09:33pm                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Freakin' huge amount of content + Good $20 TBP monthly membership + 30 updates per week (6 per day, M - F) + Good customer interaction with model ratings, personal favorites section, set/scene comments and a forum + No DRM + Supports download managers + Large photos (newest at 2500x1660) and all sets have zips and slideshow option and many have no or very small watermarks + Newer material appears to be mostly exclusive + Full tour available before joining Cons: - Search function leaves a real nasty after taste - More of a pic site than a video site - Model names are strange here and model info is few and far between - Quality varies - "Teen" concept loosely defined, lots of 21 to 25 year olds. - Older material is mostly nonexclusive Bottom Line: I had high hopes when I joined this baby but was only moderately entertained: sort of like dating someone who you know ain't quite right but running with it anyways just for the sex ;) This site features a lot of Euro babes with the emphasis on photography. Photos: 1280 HC sets, 1600 lez, 6000 solo and a smattering of other categories. As mentioned the newest stuff clocks in at 1660x2500 with older stuff at 2000x1300 or 1020x715 and a few 800x600. All have zip and many have a slideshow feature. Be wary if you're joining for the HC. 75% of this is leased content added a few years ago that's on all the megasites as is some newer stuff. Most of the newer solo stuff is exclusive but, again, a lot of the stuff past a couple of years ago is not. Most sets have 100 to 200 pics; oldest sets are smaller. Vids = 560 HC, 180 Lez, and 800 solo. You get only get a couple of vid updates a week. Newest stuff is 720x480 on WMV while older is 350x240. Stream rates were only OK. Like the pics, you've probably seen the older stuff around. My biggest beef is with the search function. There is 9 function search engine so it looks promising. However, even when limiting yourself to 1 or 2 of options you either get a couple of results or a ton of results. The only real way to find out what's there is to use the model directory or search by lez, HC or solo categories. With this much content that spells "p-a-i-n". The pain goes deeper when you look at the categories. They use a magazine cover to show the girl but often times it's the same used for every shoot the girl does. You don't know what the content of the shoot is unless you dig into it. There is very little if any info on most of the models. A lot of models, even known ones, somehow get stuck with different names so it's hard to find exactly what you're looking for. Most of the emphasis here is on the youngish gals doing photo solo sets. For the most part, they were only OK. Not much eroticism or tease factor here. Part of this is due to the fact that they get a lot of their stuff from outside sources. This factor also explains why the quality can vary from set to set. Some are great, others are poorly cropped and shot. The girls are generally fairly attractive. Not top shelf but not off the street either. Thankfully there was not a lot of silicon here, at least in the solo content and newer HC stuff. This site gets an 85 for sheer volume, good pic sizes and good newer vids. You also get acccess to the Vivthomas bonus site. Not as big as his "real" site but not bad. It's definitely one of the better bonus sites you can get. It loses ground on it's half ass search function, varying quality and the fact that the older stuff has been around the block a few times. If you like solo girls and pics this is a pretty good place for the value; just plan on spending some time digging through it all. Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (4) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 Tree Rodent (0) Very informative review. This was a site I was contemplating joining at one time, but there are too many negatives and too many other sites that offer a bit more, especially as I prefer vids to pics. Nowadays before I join a site I always try to work out the TR - tattoo ratio. 02-25-09  06:04am Reply To Message 2 Wittyguy (0) REPLY TO #1 - Tree Rodent : Actually, there's a good tat ration here. Only a few and they tend to be more modest. As for the vids, can't really help you there. Most of the solo vids are in the 10 to 15 minute range if that helps at all. 02-25-09  10:31am Reply To Message 3 lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #1 - Tree Rodent : I was a member a couple of years ago, so you can consider my information dated. But there were very little tatoos on the models. Most girls are tatoo-free, the others are only modestly tatooed. This is a mega-site for teens. -5,600+ models -1.4+ million pix -1,400 vids The quality of the pix is mainly good. The clarity (focus) of the pix is mainly good, the colors of the pix are mainly OK to good. The quality of the pix is not as good as Met-art or MPL Studios, but the quality is still decent for a lot of the pix. The attractiveness of the models varies, but they do have a lot of the top European models on this site. The vids I downloaded as a member were mainly soft core solo shoots of each model. There is hardcore on the site, both pix and vids, but as I said before, I'm not into vids that much because it's really hard to find attractively shot vids; quality photo shoots are just easier to make, for a variety of reasons: lighting, make-up, dialog (hearing these models speak destroys the illusion of glamor or style you want them to have), etc. I do agree that the search feature is poor. I honestly do not know why these mega sites can not have a simple, easy to use search like met-art. Another problem is that different models can have the same name, which adds to the confusion. And the same model can have different names. I think Teen Dreams is definitely worth joining at least once, to check out the massive collection of models, pix, and vids that are available. But if you have specific desires that don't fit the simple criteria of a a mega teen site with a lot of pix and vids, then you are better off looking elsewhere to spend your time and money. 02-27-09  08:39am Reply To Message 4 Tree Rodent (0) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone : Thanks for the info. It's a site I have considered joining for about 4 years! I never did because there always seems to be a better site about, and because I am mainly a hardcore vid person rather than softcore pic person. The site still sounds pretty good though. As you say, I gotta check it out once. 02-27-09  08:43am Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.