Review Replies (5)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
Your review is very short on details. If you have the time, you should read the thread, "What should a PU review include?", which is found at:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ead.html?threadid=57
If you don't have the time or patience to read the entire thread, which is only 2 pages long, you can read 2 of the more important posts of the thread:
1. The introductory post #1, by Wittyguy, which explains what he thinks a good review should include.
2. Post #7, the cheat sheet created by Toadsith, which is a detailed listing of the main factors many PU members want to see in a review.
The review you write is your own personal creation, based on your own ideas and opinions and facts, but to have value for the PU site members, some specific tech details, site numbers (number of photos, videos, etc.), and your own opinions should be included.
|
05-21-09 12:54pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
uscue (0)
|
One thing to note about that I noticed a lot of people do for various sites: you shouldn't include a con for something that should not be expected at that site. Example: Videobox - as the name suggests - is a site for videos. They don't advertise pictures or want pictures..it's strictly a site for videos. Therefore, the absence of pictures shouldn't be a con.
That's like going to Blacks on Blondes and for cons writing "there are no white guys". That would be like going to Exploited Moms and for cons writing" all the women are MILFs, no young teens in the scenes".
Other than that, i agree that VB is a site to keep subscribing to
|
05-21-09 09:48pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
asmith12 (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :
> your own opinions should be included.
ESPECIALLY your own opinions.
|
05-22-09 12:06am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
This is a great site I do not doubt,
But to give a 98 is near perfect and would in
MHO, need far more detail for me to agree with a 98.
I gave it a 94 in my review but gave details.
Please try and entice to visitors to read your reviews
by supplying something to read, and you own take and opinions
please.
|
05-22-09 10:27am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
As others have said, this review is lacking anything that makes it a review
Definitely best bang for the buck - why? what makes it so good?
Great search engine - really? what about this search engine makes it so good?
Good video quality (premium) - good - not excellent? For a 98 score? Does it look good full-screen? Is it DVD quality?
Fleshing out the things that you do say, however minimal they are, would make your review more valuable to other people that read it.
|
05-22-09 06:16pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
