Comment Replies (5)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
Since the site is non-nude, maybe it qualifies as some sort of fetish. But does it qualify as porn?
Some people have a fetish about shoes, but I would not classify a shoe catalog from some retail store as porn, even though a shoe fetishist might use the catalog to excite himself/herself.
From Wikipedia, which is not a dictionary but an encyclopedia:
"Pornography or porn is the depiction of explicit sexual subject matter for the purpose of sexually exciting the viewer. Pornography makes no claim to artistic merit, unlike erotica which does."
This site is non-nude, and I assume there is no "depiction of explicit sexual subject matter". So why would it be considered porn?
Or maybe the site is supposed to be erotic.
But if a book store had a photographic book with pictures from this site, I doubt they would classify the book as either pornographic or erotic.
|
06-18-09 08:53am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :
You bring up a good point. The site is part of a network that does have some nudity and even insertions, so this restriction it mentions is apparently self imposed. Is this site porn? In my opinion, I don't think so either. However it is listed on TBP. This makes me wonder what standards TBP has regarding non nude sites being listed.
|
06-18-09 09:30am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #2 - mbaya :
mbaya said: "However it is listed on TBP. This makes me wonder what standards TBP has regarding non nude sites being listed."
Perhaps you missed it, we made an announcement back in May of 07 that we started listing non-adult sites
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4133
|
06-18-09 09:54am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - mbaya :
My brain started to short out from trying to figure out the difference between porn, eroticism, a shoe catalog, and this pay site.
I would need a new brain before I started to think about PU/TBP standards. Though I am sure the PU/TBP standards are exceedingly high. (I don't want the PU staff kicking me off the site because I am not showing sufficient respect for their high moral standards and whatnot.)
Personally, I am not into shoe catalogs. But I don't mind looking at photographic books of movie stars. That is not erotic(I don't think), but the older movie stars had some great-looking women. Head shots, wearing lovely dresses, or even casual, they had glamor, an aura, just beautiful to look at.
|
06-18-09 09:57am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
ace of aces (0)
|
funny funny, how i hate that non nude content. should think about making a site with holiday pictures and sell it monthly for 34,95 $ :)
every commercial of sexnumbers is more interesting then such sites LOL
however beeing trapped means, having money wasted. that`s a pitty
|
06-19-09 08:57am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
