Review Replies (4)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Denner (0)
|
Have not been at the site for some time (almost a year) - but I've read this fine review - and one question still pops up:
Quality of videoclips.
"You are not getting super high quality clips, but you are getting good quality clips"
Use to have a load of clips from this site in the archives, but deleted all. No problem with most scenes, but the "quality" has been rather mediocre: milky, blurred ect.
Has it grown better lately concerning the viewing-quality?
|
07-01-09 07:41am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Denner :
Quality of clips:
I am not an expert like Toadsith, so I can't give the technical aspects of the DVD clips, or the expert's appraisal of the clips. I am giving an average viewer's response to video clips (who has some, but not extensive experience in viewing porn clips).
If you've been a member of justteensite, justteenmovie, or femjoy, you will have seen extremely clear, clean videos. I am talking about visually. They have the highest quality in terms of clarity and detail, almost like high-quality photos.
The video clips at SilverstoneDVD and DevilsFilm are not as high quality visually as the videos at Femjoy, justteensite, and justteenmovie. I remember reading one post at PU that explains that DVD clips are not visually as high quality as the video clips at some special sites because of economic reasons (it's cheaper to shoot lower quality clips because of the video camera cost and maybe other reasons).
The high def video is listed as 1280x720 at justteensite and justteenmovie.
The femjoy, justteensite and justteenmovie clips I saw were softcore, which is apart from the quality of the clip.But the clips were made for those sites, not as part of a DVD.
SilverstoneDVD and Devilsfilm are hardcore clips, made for a DVD market. So that explains why the visual clarity is not as high.
I saw a large number of clips at SilverstoneDVD and Devilsfilm, and thought they were good or decent quality, not high quality, but good. I did not see any clips that were visually mediocre as in milky or blurred. These are professionally shot clips, no jerky camera shots, fairly good editing (editing could be improved, the entire clip could be improved, but what do you expect from a porno DVD?).
These are straight sex clips, with almost no story.
Production values are not great, but the colors are good: for the skin colors of the models, for the colors of the settings.
I did not examine all the clips. For me to look at a clip,
1. I look at the model in the clip: Is the attractive? If not, skip the clip.
2. If the model is attractive, I watch the streaming clip, to see if the sex is stupid, is the moaning and groaning too annoyingly fake, the background music too loud or jangly.
3. I download and save the clips I like. To see them again later.
All the clips I saw had good, not mediocre, viewing-quality.
There are at least some models at SilverstoneDVD and Devilsfilm that are really attractive. The clips would be improved if they had some story, some teasing, sex that was less mechanical, better acting by the model, less fake moaning and groaning by the female and male models (but the moaning and groaning is less than in many porn clips), better background music, softer background music, and the entire clip could be improved. But at least you get some clips of attractive girls that are watchable.
Visually, these are good-quality hardcore clips.
|
07-01-09 10:38am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Denner :
Video clips at SilverstoneDVD and Devilsfilm download as WMV files.
There are 2 file sizes for each clip: small and big.
I downloaded the big file size.
Tech specs for the video clips (at both SilverstoneDVD and Devilsfilm):
(for the big file size WMV download):
bit rate 2115 kbps
dimensions 720x528
Sample femjoy specs:
bit rate 7259 kbps
dimensions 1280x720
The femjoy bit rate varies from clip to clip, but is much higher than what you get at the DVD sites.
(I would have added this to my first reply, but the message can't be edited past 10 minutes.)
|
07-01-09 02:48pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone :
Thanks lk2fireone! - that's a lot of very usefull info - guess I have to go back and give it a try.....
|
07-02-09 04:10am
Reply To Message
|
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|