| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
Solid review with nice details and opinions.
But if you were able to get through the massive photo content of this site in three months, you must have been spending a huge amount of time here. And that's if you skipped the video content, which I think is almost all skippable, anyway. :)
|
07-08-09 07:37am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
littlejoe (0)
|
i agree, ive been disappointed how many women shave completely
|
07-08-09 03:33pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
oogles (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :
Good point; I suppose I need to clairfy.
I have been a member three times, but the first time was for ONE YEAR. That's how I moved through most of the content. Then I returned twice for one month each just to catch up on the new stuff.
That's why in the bottom line section I recommended taking a one year subscription deal if you have never been a member before.
I also agree with you that most of the video is 'skippable.'
|
07-08-09 07:15pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Nice review. For lovers of softcore, you make important points briefly and well (no fake ta-ta's, no plastic schlongs, and eroticism over "art").
Now, there have been galleries at MetArt with too much "deer in the headlights," or what jd1961 coined as "JC Penny poses," but they're more the exception than the rule.
MetArt, while not perfect, is still tops in my view for erotic softcore. I'm on what's probably my 3rd 365-day membership. I'll spend a little time not subscribed, but then I'm back and at $99 for a year, considering the volume and quality of the content, it's a good deal.
Funny how I've never written a review of it. It's so popular that I really don't have much to add to what others have already said about it.
|
07-08-09 07:48pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Monahan (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - littlejoe :
The clean shaven aspect doesn't bother me that much but the absence of any heavier eroticism, such as finger insertions and/or labia play reduces the appeal of this site.
That said, perhaps it's me but it seems like the models are getting more busty, are doing a lot more leg spreading than before and are, on average, prettier than in past years.
And I wish they would do something to make their videos watchable. They are usually videos of photo shoot sessions which are not nearly as interesting as the stills.
|
07-08-09 11:10pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Monahan :
It continuously surprises me how much personal tastes can differ.
I was thinking the models of the last year were not up the the previous standards of attractiveness. There were a good percentage of lovely young girls in the past, and I've found very few that I really liked this past year.
We agree on the videos, though, but I don't know what they can do, since Met-art is strictly softcore. I find that Femjoy videos are more watchable than Met-art videos, but not by much.
If the videos went very high-definition, that might help a little. Better music background would help a little. But the main problem is the girls don't do much of anything: they walk, they sit, they lay down, stand up. If there was some story to the video, that would help, but these girls are not actresses. And the photo people are not writers that would be able to write a short plot that makes sense and holds interest.
|
07-09-09 01:52am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Drooler :
Drooler, I wouldn't mind reading one of your reviews on Met-art. You usually manage to come up with something worthwhile to say.
Mbaya posted a couple of days ago that "The reviewers I respect the most are Exotics and Gcode. I feel their reviews are simply awe inspiring and wish I could write as well. The two reviewers I find most helpful as their tastes are similar to mine are Drooler and Denner."
I would put Drooler and Toadsith at the top of my list for the reviewers I respect the most. Though some other PU members come close.
|
07-09-09 07:59am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #7 - lk2fireone :
Thanks, man. There seem to be 1-2 reviews of MetArt per month. Good to keep close tabs on things. Maybe I'll crank one out for Caesar Augustus.
|
07-09-09 01:15pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
picdude (0)
|
great review just a question on pricing though.
Is it possible to sign-up for just ONE month? ie can you cancel instead of letting it recur?
|
11-01-09 03:28pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #9 - picdude :
There's no problem if you want to sign up for 1 month. Just sign up for the 1-month recurring membership for $19.99, then cancel your membership before the month is over.
|
11-02-09 08:40am
Reply To Message
|
