| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Wittyguy (0)
|
If you're into movies then this site is/was not for you. Met Art is essentially the webs version of what Playboy was years ago - the biggest and best of the softcore photography world. Because they do use a lot of different photographers and tend to focus on euro cuties a lot of sets tend to come off feeling a bit unsensual (that's been a mild beef on my part as well). Anyway, the vids are really just teasers, the good stuff in is pix which are very good indeed.
|
07-27-09 03:07pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
asmith12 (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Wittyguy :
Good comparison with Playboy, but you know, Playboy IMHO wins this comparison hands down. For me, Playboy models feel SO MUCH more "alive" then MetArts' "dead fish" ones.
|
08-18-09 05:02am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - asmith12 :
IMHO, personal taste varies, which is part of what makes it personal. :)
One problem with Playboy, for me, is the models use too much silicone for the boob jobs (or maybe it's saline, for some of them).
|
11-02-09 08:28am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
asmith12 (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone :
Just a purely personal opinion :-): for me fake smile is SO MUCH worse than fake boobs, and in "fake smile" department Met Art is FAR ahead of the Playboy :-((.
|
11-03-09 12:50am
Reply To Message
|
