Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Kara Duhe (0)

Drooler (0) 08-28-09  03:10am                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) This site or Ron Harris? I did a bit of fact checking. Currently, according to the TBP review, there are 63 or so photosets at the Kara Duhe site. It's acknowledged in the review that some of the content is also on the Ron Harris site. FYI, there are 96 photosets currently of Kara at Ron Harris. Seems you'd probably get a better deal by subscribing to Ron Harris, since there's a lot more content of other models, too, and it's the same price via TBP. But this isn't necessarily a recommendation. You have to like the Ron Harris approach, which can mean a lot of pics of nearly the same pose. Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (2) Replies to the user comment above. Msg # User Message Date 1 lk2fireone (0) If the two sites are the same price, and you get so much more quantity at the Ron Harris site, I don't know why anyone would join the Kara Duhe if they knew about the Ron Harris site carrying the Kara Duhe photosets. But like you mention, to be satisfied with a membership at either site, you have to like the Ron Harris style of photography. You mention that a lot of pics are nearly the same pose. What bothers me more is his glossy style of photography. I can get bored with his glossy pictures very fast, for some reason, even though he has some very attractive models. That is why a site like Met-art, with a large number of contributing photographers, is so much easier to appreciate. Met-art has a huge number of attractive models, and the photographers can present them in photos that are worth looking at. Obviously not all photosets will be equally attractive to all viewers, but there is a wide selection of styles where you can find the photosets and models that appeal to you. 08-28-09  07:12am Reply To Message 2 Drooler (Disabled) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone : I'm the same way about the same stuff. I hadn't been to RH for over 2.5 years. Quite a lot of content had built up, and the updates come more often than they did when I'd last quit -- in more than a little disgust. But the glossy, shiny, RH treatment showing maybe 2-3 poses per gallery with a Warholesque monotony doesn't exactly crank my shaft. With some of them, you can actually scroll down 2-3 motions of the mouse wheel and it seems as if time is standing still. And that's not an exaggeration. MetArt, by vast contrast, is a site I can never stay away from. I've been a current member on their yearly plan at least 3 times if not more. And all for the reasons you point out. At least RH has one thing going for it: Sets that are too dark aren't too common. 08-28-09  03:23pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.