DDF Network (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
WMV (.wmv),5000k (up to 5673), 1280x720
DivX (.avi),4000k (up to 4162), 1280x720
MOV (.mov), 2000k, 960x540
Hi res pics and just about every vid scene has accompanying zipped images.
Stunning women (mainly Eastern European).
Exclusive content.
Crystal clear quality.
Good locations and sets.
Good Variety both in terms of women and 'themes'.
Excellent service.
Great 'new' price, which I have been hankering (posh British word) after for ages.
Good download speeds.
Little DRM, almost none for newer content. |
| Cons: |
Need more ethnicity.
Repeated and recycled content across the network sites.
Some dead links and unable to find certain stars via DDF main model directory.
Cheery Jul and Sandy's Fantasies stopped updating in 2007.
Slowish updates.
Older material ropey in quality.
Machine gun sex a la geezas a bit formulaic and not too sexy.
Better navigation from main site desperately needed. |
| Bottom Line: |
Repeated and recycled content is one of those areas that can be either okay if presented properly or just plain thieving if not. DDF suffers a little from both.
For example: Only Blowjobs carries the blowjob segments from the main movies across the network. Euroteen Erotica uses the so called younger looking babes from the main movies across the network........and so on.
Exceptions being mainly DDF Busty and House of Taboo.
Now, this is common practice amongst all the porn sites. Brazzers has a couple of thousand sections and categories but they are repeats from the main archive. The same can be said for many sites.
However, DDF do provide category and niche content and it makes sense to split these into defined websites. If I want to look at wenches with mutha mams I can do so without having to be forced to view said mams across all the network sites.
Sure, there are repeats and 'remastered' old content but for the price and content I am not whinging too much. However, and I have said this many times before, remastering from the original source files can be an up in quality, remastering from an existing compressed file is simply adding to the overal filesize and offering nothing in terms of increased quality.
I do object to poor links and altered tags for the downloads. I must have wasted a good day downloading the same fukin' content from the network sites as the thumbnails and tags were different from the original download links.
Main directory should carry links to visible downloads.
Whinging out of the way. Lets talk about the good shit:
Stunning, and I mean stunning babes, not the usual fukin' known stars in their treble figure ages doing the same shit. Nope, these girls are simply horny as fuck.
Some wear too much makeup but most of that is gone by the time the muscly dude has hit the money-shot.
Quality is amazing and the standard setter and if other sites followed suit then we would all be joyous wankers.
The themes and genres that DDF cover are unequalled.
Hot Legs and Feet is exactly that. Attractive women in mad clothing doing shit that we dream of.
There is very little as sexy as a well dressed woman slowly undressing out of her clothes and 'mandatory' (this must be made law) lingerie and then getting ass fukked by some dude with an 18 pack.
Anyways, this is what I like.
Some of you might prefer big-ass girls with mams the size of a small Skud missile launcher, and I am cool with that, and they too can be found on DDF busty. I might not be down with anything bigger than Lou Ferrigno but the 'big' babes at Busty are damn sexy, well dressed, and fukin horny.
Most know that I can be quite frugal with my ratings and I do like to put these sites under the wallet microscope. But TBH, at the current umbrella price with the content offered it's a no brainer.
Okay, enough exalting and if DDF are reading this then I think a weekend with Aletta Ocean and Jade Sin would be an appropriate 'thank you' for me |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
