| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
I think it's easier to find good quality softcore pics than hardcore material (pics and vids).
But most softcore vids don't really appeal to me that much.
I don't know why softcore pix are so much better than softcore vids. In general, it's easier to produce pix than vids, so that's part of the reason why softcore pix are much higher in quality than softcore vids.
Most hardcore pix that I've seen are much lower in quality than the softcore pix that are available.
But even given that quality pix are easier to make than vids, I don't understand why most softcore vids have very little value for me.
Except that with vids, there are so many more factors that can detract from the enjoyment of the vid compared to a picture. A lovely girl opens her mouth, and her voice or what she says in a vid destroys the illusion of beauty, grace, attractiveness, etc. The lighting and focus and other elements in a vid are much harder to control than for a picture. It's much more expensive shooting a video than a photoset. The detail/definition of a picture can be much higher than what is found in most videos. Etc., etc., etc. High quality softcore pix are found at many sites.
There are not a lot of high-quality softcore vids that appeal to me. There are few high-quality hardcore pix that appeal to me. There are high-quality hardcore vids, but they are much harder to find and collect than high-quality softcore photosets. Sorry if I was rambling, but the ideas I stated are the ones I believe.
|
12-10-09 12:19am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I'm like Ik2fireone about softcore vids, and my reasons why I usually don't like them are the same as his. And I'll add another detracting factor: excessive editing with cuts every few (or fewer) seconds or so. Pics don't do that!
Back when Evelyn Lory had her own site, which is now MyGlamourSite, she had vids with not much cutting. The sustained experience of watching her flirt, disrobe, and play with herself was great! She's gone into retirement, I'm pretty sure. Miss that girl!
With hardcore, it's vids over pics for me, but I don't search for those nearly as much as I do for softcore pics.
|
12-10-09 01:26am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Denner (0)
|
Hardcore - there're just LOADS of material out there...
Softcore - it's completely another question - to make top-softcore (videos) it just takes more, it seems - and this user is hunting - all the time...
|
12-10-09 08:08am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Capn (0)
|
Softcore for me, but it is difficult to find the right level. I like explicit full nudity, but not toys.
Occasionally I like something more hardcore, but not often.
|
12-10-09 09:49am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
I had originally picked MILF but since my niche is actually GILF I switched my vote to "other!"
|
12-10-09 10:25am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
monty2222 (0)
|
I voted "other", though it's girl-girl I most often hunt for so maybe I should have voted "softcore". My understanding was that softcore = showing breasts and pubic hair, but no genitals; and hardcore = showing everything. Has it changed to softcore = solo and girl-girl; hardcore = boy-girl? *confused*
|
12-10-09 10:39am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
mr smut (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - messmer :
But where's the border between MILF and GILF? I've choosen MILF because I like 40+ girls that still look pretty. So far I've seen a lot and even some girls in their 60ies look damn' pretty :-)
MILF absolutely and in all varities of course! Lesbian MILF, fetish MILF, softcore MILF, solo MILF, hardcore MILF etc.
|
12-10-09 11:34am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Monahan (0)
|
I said softcore, but the problem is the choices are not mutually exclusive.
I like FTV a lot, for example. Is that softcore or teen? I also like DDF a lot which has a lot of solo girl stuff but also does some b/g as well.
I am losing interest in Brazzers, mainly because the majority of models are excessively siliconed these days, but where a natural babe is doing it I like it as well.
So just because my preference is a gorgeous natural babe showing off her assets whether or not there's a penis, a toy, another babe, bondage, whatever, in the scene, I would have voted "all the above" if that was a choice. It wasn't a choice so I went with softcore.
|
12-10-09 04:48pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
pat362 (0)
|
I said other because except for a couple of choices. I hunt for all of these. I like variety so that's what I look for in my porn like in most other things.
|
12-10-09 07:36pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #7 - mr smut :
Hi, mr. smut, for me the divide is at the age of fifty. Before that they are MILFS after that they are G(rannies)ILFS. :-)
|
12-11-09 04:33pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :
Drooler, have they been using more photoshop or a similar process at metart? I don't mind some photoshop at metart, but lately it seems to be used over-much and the photosets, even of attractive models, are less appealing. The coloring and appearance of the model seems fake instead of real.
|
12-11-09 06:11pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
mr smut (0)
|
REPLY TO #10 - messmer :
Hahaha o.k. that's a fine definition. If this is true then I'm a MILF and GILF lover :-)
|
12-11-09 09:24pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #11 - lk2fireone :
There are things that seem either too 'shopped or maybe not enough, depending. Majoly's work is one of the 'shoppiest, in my my book, and that hasn't changed. He's still the Master Shellacker.
Not enough 'shoppin'?: There was a recent set of Ralina A on train tracks that had the classic orange skin tone issue, which I really, well, ugghh! The only way that could be at all natural would be if she were an all-day carrot cruncher. I don't know if that's bad 'shoppin' or just bad color control.
Frankly, it doesn't seem to me that things have changed that much, except that Super 'Shopper Magoo isn't around much (thankfully) and that there isn't as much Tim Fox as before. His stuff looks good.
|
12-11-09 10:33pm
Reply To Message
|
