Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Art-Lingerie (0)

Drooler (0) 12-19-09  05:06am                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) What's the Difference? This site looks attractive, but I wonder what distinguishes it from the other "only" sites that this same company puts out. The tour isn't nearly as good as at OnlyTease, for instance. Sure, it looks good, but it lacks the important details about image dimensions, zips, and so on. Don't they'd think that people would want such details? Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (7) Replies to the user comment above. Msg # User Message Date 1 Capn (0) Yes. Also I am a little puzzled as to why they have not used their 'trademark' 'Only.....' nomenclature. :0/ 12-19-09  02:27pm Reply To Message 2 anyonebutme (0) It's a whole different style, where the "only" sites compete against more the likes of ATK, Karups, etc., this site probably is positioned to be on the level with Met-Art, Femjoy, etc. Instead of office clothes or formal dresses with but an occasional glimpse of the girl's naughty bits, this site uses sexy skimpy lingerie, more outdoor settings, and a helluva lot more skin. They are largely different in substance. All I know is I like what I see, and not a concern in my mind about image dimensions & zip downloads, I'm confident they will more than fine. Regardless, site owners lie, why would you think to look at the tour for information? ;-) 12-20-09  12:17am Reply To Message 3 Drooler (Disabled) REPLY TO #2 - anyonebutme : Some site owners lie, but certainly not everyone. But I think you know that already. 12-20-09  01:38am Reply To Message 4 anyonebutme (0) REPLY TO #3 - Drooler : Definitely sarcasm in my words. Though even if the site listed out the specs for their members area, you'd still want independent verification of it, right? Preview galleries are already trickling out across tgp sites for anyone to look at. 12-20-09  08:33am Reply To Message 5 Drooler (Disabled) REPLY TO #4 - anyonebutme : Ah, yes. The tgp sites. I don't know why we even bother with TBP/PU. 12-20-09  11:09am Reply To Message 6 anyonebutme (0) REPLY TO #5 - Drooler : While this site is good at what it does, there's nothing wrong with also making use of what else is is out there to get an idea of what awaits inside the porn site. We both agree that this site's main tour pages are lacking in good details. 12-20-09  01:06pm Reply To Message 7 Drooler (Disabled) REPLY TO #6 - anyonebutme : Now another person, alanralph, has come on as a member and has given us more info. 12-20-09  01:56pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.