Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

My Friend's Hot Mom (0)

Newbie 76* SnowDude (0) 06-01-07  11:22am                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -You get over 135 videos going back to December of '03, most with a "mom" and a "friend", but some occasionally have more than one girl -Each video comes with a picture set and since '05 they have been real digital shots with zip downloads at two different quality settings -If you enjoy mature pornstars who are glam and not amateur, this site may be just the thing you're looking for -Included with the site is full network access to Naughty America's 10 "Tier 1" sites all for under $25 a month Cons: -The scenarios are incredibly lame and the acting is absolutley terrible with little variation from one vid to the next -Most of the "Moms" are pornstars way past their prime and I doubt any of them were someone's mom when they were filmed -The highest kbps of the oldest videos (WMVs) is around 750 and they've only offered 1000 and 2000kbps since sometime in March of '07 -Before the end of '05 all pic sets are vidcaps and only offer zip options intermitently with no apparent rhyme or reason Bottom Line: This is the third site I'd reviewed for the Naughty America network and probably the last I specifically wanted to see. While I had mixed reviews on the first two, I was happy with the video quality. Unfortunately, that takes a real turn for the worse here. The site offers over 135 videos that are "Mom" themed, but besides that use the same lame scripts as the other network sites. Basically, you have a mother who somehow runs into her son's best friend and through the miracle of reality porn they end up having sex. The site appears to have started around the end of '03, but until the middle of '05 most pics sets are vidcaps without zip options and it's amazing to see what passed for "high quality" just 4 years ago. Until the last few months, the highest quality setting for the WMV files was around 750kbps, but is now as high as 2000kbps. Those newer vids are pretty good quality, but the previous lower resolution WNV files are very fuzzy and the MPEGs are even worse. I wasn't cracked up about the first two network sites I reviewed and am even less so with this one. The scenes all seem to have been written and filmed by someone's 13 year old brother and with many performers repeating (some as many as 7 times) it just never allows you to escape into the fantasy. If you want quick sex scenes with young guys and aged pornstars this is your lucky day. If you didn't get full network access I'd say pass because this one definitely misses the mark and not by a small margin. Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (4) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 DpornGuy (Suspended) spot on review. this site and the networks content is pretty stale.. same sex scenes, scenarious, positions even, a-b-c formula that gets tiring. even the models don't seem into the sex that much either. 06-01-07  12:14pm Reply To Message 2 SnowDude (0) REPLY TO #1 - DpornGuy : Thanks for the comments Dporn Dude! I'd heard really good things about NA and had even watched some promo scenes I liked a lot, but the cover didn't match the inside for sure. There's one of the sites I did like a bit more than the others which I will review soon. I do think you hit the nail on the head though when you said the network has become stale and that the girls aren't that into the action. I don't expect outstanding real orgasms every time, but some level of enthusiasm would be nice. -SD 06-05-07  03:29pm Reply To Message 3 DpornGuy (Suspended) REPLY TO #2 - SnowDude : exactly. most of the girls on the site have done some amazing scenes on other sites. I think the site has reached a point where quality control isn't a priorety, more a case of "quantity" instead of "quality". The newer sites look promising, but if they're anything like the previous.. well.. damn i guess.... 06-06-07  04:10pm Reply To Message 4 SnowDude (0) REPLY TO #3 - DpornGuy : I agree completely Dporn dude! I did like a couple of the other NA sites, but overall I'm just waiting for my membership to run out and wasn't impressed at all. :( 06-12-07  06:45pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.