| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
No, for different reasons.
It would make extra work for the site owners, without any real benefits.
If a straight reader doesn't want to read the gay site reviews, he/she can just skip over them.
Where do you put the tranny sites? Do you need a third, separate site for that category?
I think we can all co-exist here on a single site, and that it wouldn't improve the site by practicing discrimination (joke).
I don't think it's a real big deal, one way or the other. I do think it makes more sense, especially for the site owners, to have a single site, especially because I don't know how much traffic a gay-only review site would generate for the extra work.
But I will be curious to see how the PU membership votes.
|
01-17-10 12:34am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Pretty much the same as Ik2. And he raises an important question about where we draw the line (tranny sites).
When I see "gay" in a listing, I just move on.
|
01-17-10 01:46am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
I vote to keep the reviews together. I don't have any interest in either gay or tranny sites, but I appreciate well written reviews. I have given trust votes to reviewers who rate sites that fall into these categories.
|
01-17-10 02:15am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Denner (0)
|
Do not bother me - even if I'm not interested in gay-material. Like Drooler - when I see the word 'gay' at a new site or review, I just move on.
And on other thing: What could be the next?
Move tranny, move fetish, move lez, move bizar...
NO, let it be!!!
BTW: It could be interesting to see some arguments from PUs who vote YES...
|
01-17-10 06:31am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
Like everyone else has said, I say leave it be. It's not my thing either, but I see no need to discriminate or segregate here.
|
01-17-10 06:34am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
pat362 (0)
|
I'm with everyone else. Leave it the way it is. There is already a notice that says gay on the review so if it's not your cup of tea then skip over it.
|
01-17-10 09:09am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
james4096 (Suspended)
|
I agree that things should stay the way they are. Just think of it as any other niche/fetish that doesn't interest you, like feet, bondage or granny.
The only reason I can think of to separate it is that it might actually get more traffic that way. I'm sure gay porn users are less likely to come to a review site they assume is all about straight content. If this were called "Gay Porn Users" then people who were into that would flock there. That's what I think.
But we can all coexist.
|
01-17-10 10:45am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Monahan (0)
|
The term "Gay" used to include lesbians, which are among my few "fetishes."
I don't dig B/B, but I'm OK with G/G and B/G. I've seen some B/B/G where the babe and a guy give head to the other guy. Doesn't do much for me but I'll watch if the babe is watchable.
I don't see any reason why B/B Gay stuff needs to be in a separate PU site, but if the folks who run PU think it's better, I'm OK with it. (I voted for option #2)
|
01-17-10 11:59am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
Where would it end? Gay separate from straight, but then would you separate each niche from the other? BDSM, spanking, anal, tranny, lesbian would become a separate group or groups? What about anal, is that to be separated out also? Photography separate from videos?
Having it all together, we can skip over stuff we're not interested in if we like, but still find a great variety of material without going to dozens of review sites.
|
01-17-10 01:54pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
uscue (0)
|
Technically lesbians are gay too, so you want us to go there for lesbian movies as well? Although I can say, I'm not a fan of gay or lesbian movies. Lesbian films just don't get me off for some reason
|
01-17-10 07:25pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
FlashBackChild (Disabled)
|
Yes
|
01-18-10 02:19am
Reply To Message
|
12
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
FWIW, we agreed to run the poll but there are currently no plans to split the site into gay and straight sections.
|
01-18-10 06:16am
Reply To Message
|
13
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
There are comments and reviews about a lot of sites that I don't care about, so I don't see the need to segregate any particular niche - I just read about the sites that I'm interested in, leave the other ones to the people that are interested in those.
|
01-18-10 06:18am
Reply To Message
|
14
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
Keep 'em together. Porn is Porn. Look at that which appeals to you and skip that which you don't like.
|
01-18-10 11:07am
Reply To Message
|
15
|
GCode (0)
|
lol at people actually saying to keep them seperate in the poll (it is the majority right now). As messmer said, porn is porn. This is PU not SPU (straight porn users). I can't even fathom why anyone would want it seperate. Oh wait, the porn users who like gay porn cannot speak to us straight porn users? lol x10.
|
01-18-10 11:36am
Reply To Message
|
16
|
Wittyguy (0)
|
It's not worth breaking it down, besides sometimes the reviews can be interesting to glance at as they appear on the PU home page. I don't read most reviews because the sites don't interest me. If I can't filter out the gay stuff searching through the content here then I'm really in trouble and lucky if I'll find my way back to PU.
|
01-26-10 07:55pm
Reply To Message
|
17
|
Colm4 (0)
|
Late reply but oh well. I made up the poll cause occasionally I accidently click on a gay site thinking it was a straght one. Not something I would like to see.
Note that I have nothing against gay people, but it's just not my thing.
|
02-01-10 03:43am
Reply To Message
|
18
|
RON B (0)
|
I THINK it should stay with all the other sites and yes, i have clicked on a gay site by mistake and yes i wasn't happy but to seperate it seems kind of homophobic and i hate homophobia people. Sorry . Just imho.
|
02-01-10 02:37pm
Reply To Message
|
19
|
Homegirl (Disabled)
|
Another review site for gay porn is ok with me as long as there are lesbian reviews too.
|
06-01-20 11:51am
Reply To Message
|
20
|
Kody (0)
|
I don't really see why they should be separate. There are many niches of straight porn I'm not into. It doesn't bother me that they are not reviewed here, I just don't read the reviewers.
Everything in one place makes for a bigger, more diverse community I think.
|
06-02-20 04:09am
Reply To Message
|
