Comment Replies (7)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
I agree that the site preview is terrible, in that it does not show short clips of at least some of the site videos or photos.
The preview area states you get full access to over 25 bonus sites, but does not name any of the bonus sites.
I would give the preview a rating of "shit" or "shitty", which would have been a failing grade back in the day.
However, if you haven't been a member of this site or any of the Royal Cash sites, and if you are into teens, you might want to join for a 1-month membership. The network is primarily a teen video site. There are photosets, but the photosets are low-quality pictures that are basically screen-caps of the videos.
There are about 4 sites in the Royal Cash group that have hot teen videos that are the main attraction of a membership: fresh young girls, most models you have not seen elsewhere, in straight-fuck videos with little to no storyline. Straight-fuck means no story, but there is bj, anal, vaginal, whatever, mainly boy-girl, but some girl-girl, some threesome, at the different sites.
|
01-03-10 11:34am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
No samples worth considering, but at least they have "Nastya" of a couple of "Nastya and Tosha" scenes there. Nastya is also at TeenDreams and a few other sites now. She's really sexy!
|
01-03-10 12:22pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :
There are about 4 sites in the Royal Cash group that have hot teen videos that are the main attraction of a membership: fresh young girls, most models you have not seen elsewhere, in straight-fuck videos with little to no storyline. Straight-fuck means no story, but there is bj, anal, vaginal, whatever, mainly boy-girl, but some girl-girl, some threesome, at the different sites.
Thanks, lk2fireone, that's exactly the kind of information I was looking for on the tour and didn't find. The pictures they did show made me suspicious that they might be another one of those sites that jumps right into the action .. in other words, no story. Probably not even a couple of seconds of getting undressed.
|
01-03-10 06:18pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :
Thanks, Drooler. The teens looked gorgeous but as I found out from lk2fireone there doesn't appear to be much foreplay, something that definitely adds to a scene for me! :-)
|
01-03-10 06:21pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
OneMan (0)
|
Trust me....no samples needed....most of the videos on most of the network sites are stonkingly good quality. At $20, it's a real no-brainer.
|
04-18-10 08:51am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - OneMan :
Thanks, OneMan. I changed my mind about subscribing once I found out that they jump right into the action, something I have objected to for years. But I do appreciate your answer.
|
04-18-10 09:40am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Divinx (0)
|
Navigation is perhaps my main complaint for most (almost all) sites.
Usually, the free tour has good photos and video samples; members' area only some ridiculous thumbnails.
If the tour itself has no video samples, they are making a big mistake. Many of us shall not pay the cake without previously tasting it somehow.
But in this particular case, if you know the network, you already know the kind of russian teen videos to expect. In practice, you can hardly differentiate between the sites. Same girls, same production.
|
08-08-11 05:06am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
