Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

MetArt (0)

Newbie 85* squirrel (0) 01-03-10  08:14pm TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: Enormous content. High-resolution JPEG files. Files have unique file names. Navigation is simple and effective. Cons: HUGELY over-rated by TBP. WAAAY too "arty-farty." Do you REALLY need half a million pictures of skinny, flat-chested girls standing on the beach, or in some other outdoor location? Files named by photographer, not by model. Bottom Line: I'm just days away from ending a year-long subscription. As others have said, there is a huge amount of non-erotic content. Really, truly, there is probably something in the neighborhood of half a million pictures of "naked girls standing on the beach" -- just hundreds, if not thousands, of sets with nothing more close-up or erotic than a girl just standing there. Then there are "prop shots" -- if you see a girl standing there holding a bunch of flowers or an orange ball or whatever, you can rest assured that EVERY SINGLE PICTURE in the set will prominently feature that prop. And so on. This is "arty-farty" nonsense. And there are TERABYTES of it. Yes, there is plenty of "good stuff," too. Terabytes of it, too. Your job -- and it will be a substantial amount of "work" -- will be to sort through it all. The bottom line for me was that I could skip over half or more of the sets, and still walk away with thousands of sets of really good-quality photos. It was just disconcerting, at first, to go through set after set after set of non-erotic "girls standing on the beach" stuff, before I finally found something worth keeping. Naming sets by the photographer is nonsensical, except that you could use them to sort out the arty-farty photographers from the ones who actually comprehend why people like us pay money to subscribe to sites like these. Finally, the sheer volume of stuff is just astonishing. It's very easy to fill up a 1-terabyte drive. And it must constitute something beyond a million images, just speaking about the pictures. Choose what you download with care! Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (5) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 Monahan (0) I was a member for a few months 2 or 3 years ago and felt the same way. Way too many standard set ups. But on several occasions a real knockout babe showed up with a super pro photographer shooting some outstanding stuff. I quit because the videos (I'm more of a video guy) were tepid and mostly videos of the photo shoots (yawn...wake me when it's over please)and I found myself both bored and frustrated; bored with the sameness and frustrated with the difficulty finding good stuff to download. So I'm in agreement 100% with your review. The score of 85 you gave it is very fair given the quality and quantity compared with other photo sites and reflects my view more than the higher scores posted by others. 01-04-10  12:02am Reply To Message 2 Denner (0) Different and refreshing review - and I agree.... Like Monahan, I go for the videos - AND they are not worth a membership. And all those outdoor scenes are getting too much at MetArt. But, I like skinny girls - just wish MetArt could make better and sexier shoots (indoor) and BETTER videos... 01-04-10  06:13am Reply To Message 3 lk2fireone (0) I agree that the videos are mainly a waste of time. But you get a huge amount of photosets of yummy knockout babes. You also get a huge number of contributing photographers, so the differing styles of the photography, while not wildly different from each other, should give most softcore teen fans of photosets plenty to find satisfaction with. This is the best teen softcore site on the net for photosets, based on quality of photosets, quantity of photosets, the huge number of contributing photographers, the huge number of attractive models. The large number of free live-cam hours for the models (part of the membership) is just a bonus. 01-04-10  06:59am Reply To Message 4 PinkPanther (0) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone : Count me in with lk - the amount of excellent material for my tastes is pretty much un-paralleled, though there are many sets that I'm not interested in - given their rate of updates, I'm rarely going a day without finding a photo-set that I like quite a bit. Their vids set the standard for "how boring can you be?" Their cam shows - which go on for much of the day - are frequently wonderful. Though if you're craving babes banging themselves and screaming "EddieRascal411, fuck my ass now!", stick to the cam shows at Naughty America - you won't see that here. 01-04-10  08:01am Reply To Message 5 Drooler (Disabled) I'm also more with ik2fireone. I really like the site and don't mind the skinny girls with small tits. I guess it's just a matter of taste. And you were fair enough to give it an 85 in spite of it all. That's pretty close to what I'd give, too, but for different reasons (bad lighting, blurriness, overly done scenes such as girls in puddles, etc.). 01-04-10  10:36pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.05 seconds.