| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
nadiencendia (0)
|
As it turns out, I happen to like the look of the sets in this set. They are more clean or natural than others on DDF (or 21Sextury, for that matter), with models wearing too much make up and everything looking too fancy, too perfect. It's true that this site probably wouldn't be good enough on its own, but as a part of a network, I think it includes some interesting surprises...
|
08-24-10 02:38am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - nadiencendia :
I made a similar type comment in my review of Femjoy, saying that I preferred the Met-art look over the Femjoy look in the photosets. And I got a couple of responses that preferred the Femjoy look as more natural. So taste is very much a matter of personal opinion.
Nobody agreed with me that the Met-art look is better than the Femjoy look. :)
So I can't dictate what other people prefer. I was just making a comment that this site is more of a "natural" style than a "glamor" style.
I definitely do prefer a more glamorized style. Not ultra glamor, but some glamor.
|
08-24-10 03:21am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
nadiencendia (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :
Of course, it's all a matter of taste, and nobody can decide for us what turns us on :DDD In general, I do prefer clean and natural over make-up and glamourous, but that's just personal, of course... And the good thing is that the internet is big enough for all of us, and there is porn for every taste :D
|
08-24-10 03:24am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - nadiencendia :
Very well said.
And that's why PU is such a valuable site. The members are intelligent, courteous, and helpful.
|
08-24-10 03:28am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
No, it's definitely a non-glamor one. They try to make the models look as young as possible which to me is almost the opposite of the glamor look.
|
08-26-10 01:24pm
Reply To Message
|
