Comment Replies (5)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
If it's a contest, I'd say that Nubiles and X-art have much more erotic vids than Met-art and MPL Studios. Nubiles has softcore and hardcore, the same with X-art, but the X-art approach is more softcore erotic, even when doing hardcore.
But if you are doing a straight comparison of MPL Studios and Met-art, then MPL Studios has more erotic videos.
Personally, I think the main value of Met-art and MPL Studios is in their photosets.
Nubiles and X-art have value in both their photosets and their videos.
X-art is the smallest site of the 4 sites. But if it had the same amount of content as the other 3 sites, I personally think it would be the best site to join. But that will never happen, because Met-art keeps adding content at a massive rate. And the other 2 sites are much larger than X-art.
But I think that all 4 sites are fine choices, to join. That's my personal opinion, because some PU members think Met-art is a waste of time and money.
|
12-21-10 08:44am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :
It's certainly hard to disagree about Nubiles - and also now X-art in this deal - erotic, sensual, horny ect. solo vids....
And we could put in a couple of others.
I still find that those (in my stash) MPL-videos are so much better than MetArt - and it's really between those two I'd be great to hear some views from fellow PUs...
Anyway, I'm with you all the way here, lk2..
|
12-21-10 08:49am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Lionheart (0)
|
I also have been wondering about the style in which they shoot their movies in. I have heard great things about this site have been keeping my eye on it. I'm fine with directors making these movies more with an artistic flare as long as the actions is still good.
|
12-21-10 09:34am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Denner :
I've stated my opinion on Met-art videos several times on the PU forums, and in my review of Met-art. And my opinion of Met-art videos has changed very little over the years. The Met-art videos have improved quite a bit since the first videos they posted, many years ago, on a technical basis. But almost all Met-art videos are, in spite of lovely young models, boring and a waste of time to watch. Met-art has created an artform in boring videos of naked, lovely young girls. What a wasted effort.
The erotic and sensual value of most Met-art videos is close to zero.
|
12-21-10 03:16pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
yote78 (0)
|
As beautiful as the models are on MPL, MetArt and the like...and as as glamorously as they are shot, those sites are just too artsy for my taste. I'm not into really rough stuff but I do need more than just nudity, that is,some kind of sexual action, to differentiate between erotic photos/vids on a website and oil paintngs in a museum.
|
12-22-10 07:16am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
