Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

I Feel Myself (0)

Newbie 89* graymane (0) 01-01-11  07:00am            TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: The solo action here is exactly what I’m interested in : They're done mostly on a bed by models lying on their backs, starting slowly removing clothes piece by piece as gyrations intensify and build up to their masturbation scenes, most of which are done very well and in different degrees of momentum. All acts culminates in orgasms. Each model’s page opens with her name, length and size of the video. An option to stream or download in either WMV or High performance. Also on the model's page is a list of her other clips, onto which one can simply click to open. Video quality is quite satisfactry, with some inovations added I haven't seen elsewhere. A forum exist for those who want to communicate their thoughts . Updates are done on a daily basis, although too complicated for me to figure out. A page navigation with over 200 sections listing about six models’ pages is a convincing reminder there's ample videos for the full price Cons: The fact clips are so artfully done, one can almost overlook the shortage of the usual glamor one finds in most models found on other sites of it's kind. Perhaps its’ a good thing, though, because the "plain Jane" "real-life" type we get here does appear to present a fresh change. But, I hasten to add there's no shortage of "babes" either, whose natural beauty introduces something Porn marketing could use more of. Many of the clips were done which included the model's girlfriends, conversations, and girl-stuff which interested me in no fashion. IFM promotes, as well as present too much space for their other pay sites to suit me. I left them alone for fear I’d be roped into joining another site. Bottom Line: I visited this site a couple years ago, and, upon this recent revisit, I found little change except for the added models. As I mentioned earlier, IFM is unique and is giving me mostly what I want: Realism, routines done with elements to please most everybody. They seem to sincerelly have their members' interest in mind. One thing that stood out for me was the absence of those infernal “toys”. The fact I saw little if any of them this time has a lot to do with heightening my respect for IFM's skills at running this kind of site. I'm also pleased to see less vaginal "gouging." I suppose this whole hand digging stuff is done for effect. The more I can see of her virgina, especially on angle shots, the more I like it. I would sumit my vote, however, for more full-body scenes and limited closeups...esp. those which dwell too long on the same spot. If there was a disappointment to be had, I’d have to say it was the unavailability of any form of discount through our PU The Best Porn. Although the membership and renewal price is the full $29.95, I'm convinced I'm still getting my money's worth. I like IFM; And I enthusiastically recommend it: And its very likely I'll join again. PS... Please note this is an edited revision of my review of I Feel Myself. Since I did this initial review of IFM, I came to realize I had acted too hastly with some of my judgements, and I think it only fair to IFM to rectify those actions, if indeed they cast any negative connotations that would otherwise effect the decisions of those contemplating joining this site. Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (4) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 FeckAdmin (0) Webmaster There is a "disturbing" deficit of glamor because that is exactly our purpose. Our contributors are not models. Our site is about real people as relief from mainstream porn. This is explained in the "about" section so you need not join looking for the same old cliche. That is all over the internet. "There are an annoying number of other promoted sites splashed about" is in fact TWO static advertisements to OUR other sites on the front page sidebar. I think you would struggle to find a porn site with less advertising! Also we do not pair girls together. The couples on our site are friends or lovers who have requested to do a shoot together. As far as dicounts go, you could have taken a 90 day subscription at a hefty discount off the 30 day rate. I don't know what other discount you'd expect unless you join with a promotional offer, which for obvious reasons are not given away on the site itself. The update schedule you can't figure out is actually daily, at exactly the same time, and all releases are dated so you can verify that. Thanks for a mostly positive review but if you had read our credo and understood our purpose, and been a bit more thorough with your exploration, you would probably have no criticisms at all. 01-01-11  04:40pm Reply To Message 2 graymane (Suspended) REPLY TO #1 - FeckAdmin : I'm sorry if you think I'm being unfair in my review, but I call'm like I see'm. If there is any consolation, for what its worth, your score was among the highest I've given...and overall, dispite the barbs, I think I left a more than a favorable impression on those who might be interested in becoming your members. Let me try and address your issues, if I may: I didn't read your "about" section because if I weren't already sold on joining your site ( from other sources) I would be $29.95 richer by now. Call me technically challenged, but I do know, and expect operational features to be basic enough that one with normal ability isn't left spinning his wheels trying to figure out those things I pointed out in the review. To your credit, however, through simple rote, as one continues to use this site, he does ultimately learn to master those obstacles. I won't belabor the "discount" issue except to say yours is the only site to which I've paid full membership -- a perk for Being a member of Porn Users. BTW, I did make it clear the price was right, right? Join for 90 days? Not hardly. And about the girls: 1) Personally, my inner-feelings are by far more important to me, as it has to do with the charater and what's in the heart of this gender. 2) But through some inborn chemical genetics, I have a lust and an unyeilding and strong limited sexual interest in the female physical and external endowments. And it is only the latter which comes into play when porn is introduced, or is at the forefront. It wants only those ingrediences that turn me on. Unfortunately, in this case, for me and you, when one weighs the option of "plain Jane"..."the girl next door" "real people" etc., WELL, compared to a choice (if you will) "glamor" "sexually appealing" "erotic" or simply extraordinarly beautiful, then excuse me if I join my fellow porn users in choosing the latter. (with due adulation for the former, of course) In closing, If I were able to do so, I'd raise your score four points just for your outspoken and objective critique defending your site. 01-02-11  12:52pm Reply To Message 3 FeckAdmin (0) Webmaster REPLY TO #2 - graymane : Ok it's fine to have personal preferences, we all do, but in writing a pub;ic review it's more useful to others if you describe the content objectively and then you can discuss your tastes. Otherwise you're coming from the point of view that some girls are "correct" and some are "incorrect". These are people you're talking about, and what might be "badly proportioned" to you is "ideal" for others. In this post (para 3) you have non specific criticisms of some technical features, where it would be much more helpful if you outlined what they are, preferably using our Contact form to give us some constructive feedback. Thankyou. 01-02-11  04:47pm Reply To Message 4 graymane (Suspended) REPLY TO #3 - FeckAdmin : I want you to know I have revamped my review to reflect some of the issues you've bought to my attention. I have focused mostly on those things that I feel you're concerned about upon which I might have overreacted or exaggerated.... and I sincerily hope this will patch any ugly holes I may have left in that initial posting. I've made every effort here to reconstruct this review in a manner as to remain honest to myself and especially to IFM. Thanks for responding in the way you did, maintaining diplomacy and presentation of a clear message sent in the professsional manner one would expect from a site of this magnitude. 01-03-11  10:50pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.