Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Euro Teen Movs

Euro Teen Movs (0)

Rotterdam854 (0) 03-26-11  06:01pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Models not Exclusive

Some of the models featured here aren't exclusive like Dulsineya, Vicktoria Tiffany, Yuki, Edita, Veronika & Katerina. Being a member of Royal Clubs, Tricky Masseur many of these are common faces & believe me when I say its not an exhaustive list.Most of the male counterparts can also be found here in many sites like fuckstudies,teensexmania etc so no great shakes. Also its an astronomical price to pay for us state side of $35. Perhaps PU may consider revising its review as many of these must be factored in

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (7)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

exotics4me (0) You may be misunderstanding the review. It says exclusive content. Which means you've probably seen the models on other sites, but the scenes and shoots they have on this site can only be seen on this site. Notice in Maggie's review exclusive notes, "Yes, these are original scenes that were new to me."
03-26-11  07:27pm

Reply To Message

2

lk2fireone (0) PU/TBP lists the price as $29.95/month (recurring), or $34.95 non-recurring.

My understanding is that price is not a factor when TBP gives a score. At one time price was a factor for TBP, but a decision was made years ago to drop price as a factor in scoring sites.

When I rate a site at PU, I try to include price as a factor. But that's my personal choice.

As far as I know, price is not a factor when TBP scores a site. But perhaps Khan or someone at the PU/TBP site could comment if that policy has changed.

03-26-11  10:52pm

Reply To Message

3

Capn (0) REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

Personally, I can't see how you cannot do that.

To exaggerate somewhat, something that is worth £10 cannot be recommended if it is being sold at £50.
I appreciate value is subjective, but I do think it has to be factored in somewhere.

Cap'n. :0/

03-27-11  04:51am

Reply To Message

4

Capn (0) Very few sites have exclusive models.
Any career model is likely to pop up at various sites from time to time.

Cap'n. :0)

03-27-11  04:55am

Reply To Message

5

lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #3 - Capn :

I agree 100% with your thinking that price is one of the major factors in determining value, or how much does it cost for what your are getting.

But like I wrote, a few years ago, price was dropped as a factor in the score for a paysite by TBP.

At the same time, the TBP review often states if a site is expensive or not. Even though price is not part of the score.

03-27-11  07:59am

Reply To Message

6

Khan (Suspended) REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

You are correct, price is no longer factored in to the review score for a site.

Looking at the TBP Announcementes, Aug 2007 you'll see it mentioned.

"Cost of a site will no longer factor into a site's overall score. There was several reasons for this, such as price being very subjective based on a user's preferences and various pricing options (trials, monthly cost, video on demand, etc). So from now on, you can judge for yourself how important price is to you. The score will be based on the site's performance!"

You'll also see it mentioned in TBP's FAQ, #9 in "The Reviews" section ...
"Price is not factored into a site's overall score. The goal behind this change is to make our site ranks based solely on the overall enjoyment of the site and not have price influence the ranks. Therefore, you decide how price would affect your purchase decision. We display each site's price on most of our browse pages to make it easier for you to choose wisely."

Hope that helps.

03-27-11  09:44am

Reply To Message

7

lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #6 - Khan :

Thanks for the clarification, Khan. I remembered that price was no longer factored into the score for a site, from years ago.

But I did not know if that policy had been changed since then. Or how to check if there was a change. Except to mention that some PU staff member might comment on the issue.

And I don't have the expertise to find facts about PU policy like you do. My mind can only hold so much, and what's in there is slowly draining out like the dish water. :)

03-27-11  12:02pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.