| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Advent (0)
Webmaster
|
Thank you for taking the time to review us. Our programmers worked really hard on the new layout. If you like short haired girls you should check out Luce, if you have not already. She is my favorite short haired girl on the site.
|
05-24-11 08:47am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Capn (0)
|
I think the recent revamp is a success. I especially like the new comments feature.
Still looking & waiting for those user defined customisable zips though! ;0)
As regards photography, I think Sean Rs work is over rated.
He does what he does well, but his sets are far too repetetive
with a lot of identical poses which could easily be edited out without loss to the set content.
A personal thing, but for me he spends too long on the rear views & gynaecology & not enough full body shots.
A fair review of a solid site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-24-11 09:18am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
Your review almost tempts me to subscribe again just to see what the new lay out looks like, that plus the bigger sized pictures.
One question though, do the models still forget to bring underwear to the shoot and if they do do they keep their bras and panties on for longer than the first page. SeanR was the only one who managed to draw out a strip a bit, that's why I collected his sets, even though I think he puts a bit too much make-up on his models.
|
05-24-11 10:06am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
2 Free K (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Advent :
Anytime. I must add, too, that I appreciate the effort you've been putting into making the ATK sites as good as possible. Great customer service, great interviews, and great value for the dollar - keep it up! Karups and Nubiles try to cop your style, but ATK gives so much more, thus my allegiance is strong. The old folks have Playboy, I have ATK.
|
06-03-11 08:34am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
2 Free K (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - messmer :
@ Messmer - sorry for the delay. If you haven't been on in a while, I'd suggest checking it out - they've probably acquired a few sets worth collecting. I don't recall any big changes regarding the undressing procedure. I feel the same as you - I hate it when they're nude ASAP. I think Sean R still draws it out the longest (although I wish he didn't have such a monopoly on the UK cutie dept).
Regarding the bigger photos, I never use them. They're too big (at least for my screen). If you're viewing on a T.V. they might be useful, but on a standard monitor you end up having to scroll too much. Luckily ATK quickly realized that, so they provide several viewing and download options.
|
06-03-11 08:58am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - 2 Free K :
Thanks 2 Free K, I have taken a very nervous step in the meantime and have resubscribed against my better judgment because I couldn't resist seeing the new lay-out as well as the bigger pictures. This site used to be my favorite, that might explain why I keep hoping and going back.
Initial impression: very disappointing. The updates since I resubscribed have been incredibly boring and I have already left comments on the site regarding the photographers' lack of imagination. The new lay-out is fine but I really wish they would do away with the way they "store" their updates.
As to the big pictures, I don't understand your reluctance to download them and I am saying this without the slightest wish to be confrontational. I have found that every picture viewer like Irfan View etc. allows you to adjust your settings so that even the biggest picture will not take up more space than the size of your screen.
I agree with you that if you wish to see the large pictures in full size you'll have to do quite a bit of scrolling so I very seldom watch them that way, but why not download the latest, this way .. down the road .. you won't have to delete pictures left and right because they are hopelessly outdated.
I just got finished deleting tons of pictures whose dimensions were less than 800x600 because they no longer looked good and will, most likely, delete the 800x600 ones next. With pictures now at 2000x3000 and even higher it'll be quite a few years until they become obsolete.
Cheers, and thanks for the reply!
|
06-03-11 09:30am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
2 Free K (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - messmer :
No offense taken at all! You're probably right, once I thought about it. The technology I'm use at the moment is still a few years old, and when I think about how often I look at old sets from early-to-mid 2000s, I realize it's not very often - due to the size. I should probably start downloading the hi-res, and just find a viewer that makes it easier to set the magnification level. You have a very good point!
|
09-05-11 11:35pm
Reply To Message
|
