Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
Congratulations on breaking the 100 point barrier.
|
06-09-11 03:30am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :
Thanks, mbaya! :-)
|
06-09-11 09:03am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
Congrats on your badge! I need to join some new sites to get there too.
|
06-10-11 11:52pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #3 - RustyJ :
Thanks, Rusty! :-)
|
06-11-11 08:54am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
snickelb (0)
|
I agree on the quality. Strangely the h264 seems fuzzier than the next best quality, making me wonder if they took something that was filmed in 640x480 and enlarged it, then used a different encoding scheme to either pass it off as higher quality, fuzz the graininess, or simply lessen the size.
|
11-26-12 05:58pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - snickelb :
Hi snickelb. If you are talking about HD mp4s I could not really complain because most were nice and crisp. My problem was with the ordinary DVD quaiity (640x480) videos which I found a bit less sharp than the ones offered on Videosz.
But having said that, there are, no doubt, some HD videos that don't quite make it into "highest quality." The same is true of all video sites. Some updates are better in quality than others. Is it the remastering? Is it poor material to work with? I don't know.
|
11-27-12 10:33am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
skippy (0)
|
Thank you SO MUCH for that HD tip in advanced search! Without that, it was like looking for a needle in a field full of haystacks.
|
02-02-13 10:54pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #7 - skippy :
You are quite welcome, skippy. Glad I could be of help. :-)
|
02-03-13 09:47am
Reply To Message
|