| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I agree, and I've never understood what all of the fuss about Ron Harris' work is. The photo galleries are Warholesque in their similitude and, as you say, the updating is unreliable. Besides, the photos don't look very natural; those who dislike "shopped" pics probably wouldn't care much for it.
I've been a member 2-3 times, and I've always kind of regretted it. It's not all bad, but it's definitely overrated.
One more thing: That watermark. Awful.
|
01-28-12 03:08am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
TalonIcefire (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :
I have yet to decide whether to showcase any photos from Ron Harris. I believe he relies more on his previous achievements than his current endeavors. In my study, I’ve got two projectors (portrait and landscape, respectively) set up to randomly showcase the various models. Natural behavior is a key element in my taste and for me to display.
Although I am not into huge watermarks, one should at least take pride in your work and seal. The update pages gives you five tabs of model indexing yet does not highlight any changes. My niece has designed better websites than this. Additionally, I’ve looked at his “site bonuses” but frankly, I do not care to sift through the forgotten garbage.
The only way I’ll ever join again is if it’s offered in a two for one package deal with a site I trust and respect such as Met Art or Femjoy.
|
01-28-12 03:56am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
otoh (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - TalonIcefire :
'In my study, I’ve got two projectors (portrait and landscape, respectively) set up to randomly showcase the various models.'
I have a shelf of racy books in my study, but you, sir, show true dedication :)
|
01-29-12 03:12pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
TalonIcefire (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - otoh :
Why thank you sir. I sometimes consider myself a connoisseur to the natural beauties in life.
|
01-30-12 02:43am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Mort (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :
Yes, I have also just made the mistake of re-joining for another look, and am even more disappointed than a few years ago. Really boring photosets - the latest look like 20 or so shots of almost identical poses (perhaps a hand moved?) and the girls are way too made up or photoshopped for any of their natural appeal to show.
A site to avoid if you are looking for anything with lasting interest in pics, and the videos are no better.
Oh well, I won't be renewing or getting caught again.
|
09-18-12 02:30am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Mort :
Yes, those differences between one pic and the next are pretty subtle. Looks more like the work of a crime scene photographer sometimes, if you know what I mean.
|
09-19-12 05:12am
Reply To Message
|
