Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : TalonIcefire (0)  

Feedback:   All (68)  |   Reviews (11)  |   Comments (9)  |   Replies (48)

Other:   Replies Received (16)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 68 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment

Unfortunately, I did not read your post prior to jumping on the 75% off, two hour window on Porn Discounts. NVG was listed vice ExCoGi, my preferred go-to. As of 3-25-18, Rocket Gate is still the billing option and one still has to submit an email, which I have done, to facilitate cancellation.

03-25-18  05:36am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

I don't care for food and sex. I may use ice or feathers though.

08-11-17  07:22pm

Reply
3
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

I am able to download everything I want within 30 days making anything beyond a month's membership pointless. I'll run one membership per month and return to the site (provided they haven't gone off the stupid end, Bang Bros comes to mind) a year later for updates.

08-11-17  07:21pm

Comment
4
Visit Girls Do Porn

Girls Do Porn
(0)

My half pence

I've read many reviews and all state poor navigation, yet few truly state what poor means. That being said, the following constitutes poor navigation and user interface:

* Scenes are not sequential; they are randomly placed on every page each time you return to said page. You play a game of memory each time you view the site. This occurs with Edge, Chrome, and Firefox.
* Page back button and browser back button takes you back to the home page vice what page you were on. If you were on page 37, as noted with the home page, you must select two previous pages to navigate back to 37. Trying to navigate from a scene page lists 12 semi random scenes that shift randomly on the page.
* Page you want does not always load the correct images requiring you to reload the page and waste more time navigating back to where you were.
* Scenes do not have model names, fictitious or real.
* Every download is labeled 6.mp4.
* Scene model index images are too small to ascertain whether to view or not. One must enter the model's page or zoom (enlarge) the page to clearly see each model.
* Near as I can tell, there is no forum access tab in the membership section.
* You have to have a 2-month subscription to view the premium material.
* Few links were broken (no download and/or streaming options). (I emailed the help option detailing the discrepancies. To date there has been no response.)

The following has to do with content.

* No names for models and beyond what is available this week and forthcoming, no scene upload dates.
* Male talent's face is always hidden.
* Scenes generally have either a few words, first time sex, reason for making adult film, and first fellatio, or immediately opens to girl going straight to fellatio, then abrupt changes between positions (no smooth transitions).
* Most scenes are the same script; fellatio, doggie, cowgirl/reverse cowgirl, spanking, asphyxiation, missionary, facial.
* No cunnilingus in any scene.
* Unless the scene is a creampie, most scene's use a condom.

I've seen enough of the girls on free sites which prompted me to check out the website, however the annoying site navigation is enough to keep me from returning. Site navigation has been an issue in almost every user review I've read yet it's clearly not a concern with most review sites and the site owners.

Final note: There is a 50% off (as of July 2017) link from the forums page which is accessible when you first link to the website.

07-29-17  07:28am

Replies (0)
Reply
5
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Anything that may potentially be connected to the real world has to be secured from possible nefarious intrusion.

07-29-17  06:17am

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Links do not always go where they advertise. It's safer to type in your destination vice relying on chance to get where you intend to go.

07-29-17  06:15am

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

When I first came on board, I was daily. I rather enjoyed reading other peoples assessments and was starting to get the hang of writing decent reviews. Then my job sent me to many wonderful places; my focus had to change. Currently I am between field trips. Perhaps, I'll write new material on current sites vice comments only.

02-06-12  02:22am

Reply
8
Visit Ron Harris

Ron Harris
(0)
Reply of otoh's Reply

Why thank you sir. I sometimes consider myself a connoisseur to the natural beauties in life.

01-30-12  02:43am

Reply
9
Visit Ron Harris

Ron Harris
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

I have yet to decide whether to showcase any photos from Ron Harris. I believe he relies more on his previous achievements than his current endeavors. In my study, I’ve got two projectors (portrait and landscape, respectively) set up to randomly showcase the various models. Natural behavior is a key element in my taste and for me to display.
Although I am not into huge watermarks, one should at least take pride in your work and seal. The update pages gives you five tabs of model indexing yet does not highlight any changes. My niece has designed better websites than this. Additionally, I’ve looked at his “site bonuses” but frankly, I do not care to sift through the forgotten garbage.
The only way I’ll ever join again is if it’s offered in a two for one package deal with a site I trust and respect such as Met Art or Femjoy.


01-28-12  03:56am

Comment
10
Visit Ron Harris

Ron Harris
(0)

Overated

Although Ron Harris may have spent decades photographing some of the most beautiful women in the world, and has numerous awards and accolades under his belt, he cannot seem to post regular updates to his site. I do not understand all the various high mark reviews from various reviewer sites to include TBP. (Don’t get me wrong, I do understand the verbiage for the various porn review sites.) I can only hope Ron Harris Studio will never be the porn site by which all others are judged.
For 29.99, I signed for both Ron Harris Studio and Nubiles on January 09. Since then, neither the update page nor the coming soon page has changed for Ron Harris. I am two-thirds through my membership already! A regular membership price is too lofty for the content available. Finally, someone needs to shut the cameraman up in the videos. Whether soft-core, hard or somewhere in between, beyond interviews, I should never hear the cameraman!

01-28-12  02:47am

Replies (6)
Reply
11
Visit The Life Erotic

The Life Erotic
(0)
Reply of tangub's Reply

If it weren't for the fact that I actually like MET Art style photography, I'd wouldn't visit the site daily.

01-25-12  02:22am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Although I've enjoyed many threesomes, I don't think this activity qualifes for "someone else watching" as we were all participating.

01-25-12  02:19am

Comment
13
Visit The Life Erotic

The Life Erotic
(0)

Not completely as advertised

I joined this site only after a promo email from Met-Art. The Life Erotic claims to be a nude art site with an erotic explicit edge to it yet more than half of the videos downloaded showcased models posing for video vice explicit erotic edge.
Every video observed has a musical track in the background which is generally alright for soft-core modeling. In my opinion, I should hear the model only. She is gratifying herself.
My primary interest of late in most sites is the photo collection. I break the photos down between portrait and landscape view then showcase them as you would “normal” photos you see in any house. I agree with Tangub; I do not see the erotic and explicit side that is advertised.

01-22-12  05:00am

Replies (2)
Reply
14
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I only download the best stuff, as it pertains to me, initially. Afterwards, I'll sample other material. If I like, I'll look for more, if not, there's always delete.

01-22-12  03:22am

Reply
15
Visit Real Celeb Hunters

Real Celeb Hunters
(0)
Reply of alexmedia's Reply

At the time of my membership, there was no photo content.

09-18-09  04:20am

Reply
16
N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

Not into the full body tattoos. However, not opposed to occasional tats so long as they do not detract from the lady.

07-25-09  03:19am

Review
17
Visit First Anal Quest

First Anal Quest
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: HD quality video with decent angles & lighting
No DRM
Video resolution available is 1280x720, 800x452 & 580x328
Video bit rate is 4000, 2500 & 1000 Kbps
Download manager friendly
Amateur models
Cons: No previews, trailers or screenshots
Video format in WMA only
Videos unavailable in sectional downloads
Update slow, between 5-13 days
Expensive for available content (Currently 34 thirty minute clips at $.88 each)
Small watermarks
No photo content
Poor search engine (need to know what you are looking for)
Misleading (Most models are not experiencing anal sex for the first time)
Repetitive scenarios to include several women wearing same/similar outfits
No extra content
Bottom Line: Cost is relatively high for available content and frequency of updates. Few models are experiencing anal sex for the first time. However, the 1280x720 resolution looks good on a 52" TV. Site needs to grow to justify the cost.

07-22-09  04:38pm

Replies (0)
Reply
18
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Just because i enjoy observing, does not mean I want any part in developing. My scheduled is overloaded already.

06-07-09  04:23am

Reply
19
N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

I'm single, no kids (that I know of), no bills and a good, secure job (at least until 2018). I buy whatever toys catch my fancy. My home entertainment system gives one the cinema experience. My computers, should I use them give me the same seperately and are wired into my home system should I desire better quality vid/aud.

06-05-09  02:17am

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Duante Amorculo's Poll

None of the above. Modern American society states that in order to be "somebody", you have to be an entertainer. I say the people to be honored should be the educators. We are quickly becoming mindless barbarians. We pay millions of dollars on entertainment, yet can't seem to pony up a decent budget for our education.

06-04-09  04:45pm

Reply
21
Visit J Sex Network

J Sex Network
(0)
Reply of Khan's Reply

Thanks Khan, I'll keep that in mind next time I choose a sight with a download limit.

05-12-09  04:58pm

Reply
22
Visit J Sex Network

J Sex Network
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment

I ended my subscription back in march. I literally had to use a calculator to factor my daily download. It was very annoying. I literally got to a point of "too hell with this site" due to the download limit.

05-12-09  03:14pm

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Denner's Reply

I'm gonna have to agree with both Denner and Drooler. Watersports, Bukkake, Feces swap (really don't know what it's called). Additionally, I could care less about high heels. I mean come on now, what's the point...

04-18-09  03:53am

Reply
24
N/A Reply of GCode's Reply

GCode, errors can take place in both external and internal drives. Screw-up’s can be from registry, viral, heat, weather, power surge, or any number of reasons to be honest. I had a newly installed, brand fracking new internal drive (before my first external purchase) installed. It was NTSF formatted. The third day of use, it failed. I lost over 300 GB of data.

04-17-09  03:46am

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

Drooler, I've had everything go wrong that you've listed to include the McFuckafee mess. Coincidentally, I no longer use that program. Now I reformat every drive be they internal or external before storing data. I use an internal drive for all downloads, scrub them, sanitize them, and then transfer them to whatever external I've got them designated for as well as backed up DVD discs. If it's all the same, I'd prefer to hold off on the next unforeseeable "surprise."

04-17-09  03:37am


Shown : 1-25 of 68 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.2 seconds.