| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Gazette Risque (0)
|
It's vital to factor this into the score in my opinion. (Quantity/quality)+price=score.
Well, sort of ;)
|
03-01-12 03:21am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
Somewhat. If it's significantly high or low, it changes how much I would recommend a site.
|
03-01-12 05:51am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
pat362 (0)
|
As long as the sites is 30$ or less then I don't think the cost should be an issue. The reason why I say that is that I've joined sites that were 25$ and I only downloaded a couple of videos while I joined sites there 30$ and I downloaded a ton of content.
I've only used the price as a factor a couple of times. I know I gave the Ferro network a much lower score because I found the content in no way justified the huge cost of membership.
|
03-01-12 09:54am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Capn (0)
|
It is a factor in all my reviews.
VFM is paramount. ( Value For Money).
The only time it is a non issue is when it is a very unusual or unique site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-01-12 10:07am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
gaypornolover (0)
|
Absolutely - even if a site is fantastic quality, if there's another site that's just as good but does it cheaper, then that site is better overall as far as I'm concerned.
I'm reasonable though - I don't look for "cheap" sites - I look at the value for money the site provides, taking into account quality, frequency of updates, how much content there is available already etc. I expect to pay more for quality, but I still expect good VALUE for money. If a site is expensive but high quality that's fine.
|
03-01-12 10:10am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
slategrey (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :
I second that to a degree (25 dollars or above for me, not a baller like him). If i pay over what i think is the average price of a site i expect for above average content. Anything less will defiantly be reflected in my review score.
|
03-01-12 10:23am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
t9chome (0)
|
I haven't reviewed a site yet, but when & if I do, you can bet the price will have a bearing on my score.
|
03-01-12 11:07am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
While price is a factor, I prefer to consider it more in terms of value rather than just as a raw number. I've given high scores to expensive sites and low scores to inexpensive ones. I like to think that I explain and justify that in the body of the review.
|
03-01-12 02:48pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
tangub (0)
|
I think the most important thing is the quality and quantity of the content but value for money is important to me so of course I would consider if the price is reasonable for what's on offer when scoring the site. Plus any site which expects me to pay more for living in the UK through the regional pricing scam would usually have that listed as a con and a point or two knocked off.
|
03-02-12 02:15am
Reply To Message
|
10
|
otoh (0)
|
It's not the most important factor, but a factor nonetheless - although I suspect more for cheaper sites.
In that I would certainly mark up a site I like for being cheaper - OTOH, if a site is a bit more expensive... well, I knew that when I joined, so I don't necessarily count that against it.
As my mum always told me, something is worth whatever you are willing to pay for it... although I'm not sure she had smut in mind :|
|
03-02-12 05:34am
Reply To Message
|
11
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
Yes I factor it in all the time, even though it is for me, one of the minor considerations.
|
03-02-12 07:51am
Reply To Message
|
12
|
Denner (0)
|
Mostly/sometimes - depend: If it's one of the old, well known Top-sites where we all are aware of the price - a price that's been the same for years....then: normally not.
BUT: When encountering a new site, I definitely compare the content and the price - also in the score.
But bottom line: Capn is right - it's Value For Money...
|
03-02-12 08:37am
Reply To Message
|
13
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Ratings of household and automotive services factor in price, so why shouldn't reviews of porn sites? I'll bet Mr. Spock would have agreed.
|
03-02-12 03:00pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
I usually don't even think of the price when I write a review because most of my subscriptions are in the 25-30 dollar range so I can't get properly indignant over price if the site doesn't live up to my expectations.
One site I would make an exception for and that would be Matures.nl (I forgot their new name). If I had to pay 60 dollars CDN for a month's subscription and then found that the quality and contents were lousy that would definitely influence my score.
|
03-02-12 03:54pm
Reply To Message
|
15
|
exotics4me (0)
|
I do but it's not a big difference. If a site would be an 83 but has a low price, it will bounce up to maybe 85-86. If it has a high price, it will drop to 80-81. Biggest time price factors in is when a site has very little content and isn't updating. But a site with little content and no updates is going to score low anyway.
|
03-02-12 05:57pm
Reply To Message
|
16
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
Mostly and more so in the last year.
|
03-02-12 09:46pm
Reply To Message
|
17
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
Not as a rule, If a site is unusually cheap or expensive I will though.
|
03-04-12 01:26am
Reply To Message
|
