Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

1 Pass For All Sites (0)

Newbie 77* pat362 (0) 05-22-12  08:30am              TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: +A network of 28 sites. +You can access all the sites from the main page. +They update with about 12 new scenes per month which are broken among their 6 active sites. +Over 2600 scenes to choose from. +The vast majority of the scenes have an both a video and photoset. +Videos are in WMV and most of them are in a single WMV file. +All photosets can be downloaded in a single zip file. Resolution is 1200x800 for most of these. +All content is dated and they show upcoming updates. Cons: -21 of the sites are no longer updating and the other six don't update on a weekly basis. -It is hard to tell how much of the content is leased but there appears to be a significant amount that is. -Most of the videos are not in HD and full downloads are only available in WMV. -A percentage of the older videos are split in multiple video files. -Many of the sites content could be under one banner since the content is the same as other sites. -Scenes have no tags so no way of doing a search using tag words. -There is no real search system since you can only look under the performer's name or the site itself. -Most of the performers are not known under the name they are given on this network. Bottom Line: This network has a lot of content and I don't know if it matters that a percentage of it is leased because it's stuff you might not have anyway. The bigger issue is that a lot of this content is getting old because 2 of the sites stopped updating in 2010-2011, 4 sites stopped in 2009 and 15 stopped in 2007-2008. That only leaves 7 sites still active and these update with only 2-3 scenes per month. *I have posted a review of almost all of their active sites and these are only about a year old. I know that others have reviewed some of their sites so I'm instead posting info on some of the other sites that aren't active anymore or those that don't have or deserve a full review. **They've added a new anal themed site called young anal tryouts but it only has 34 scenes and a percentage of these are leased. That wouldn't be so bad but some of the exclusif scenes are shot using a tripod so you get shots from the same angle and no zooming or paning during the scene. The girls are really cute but I would never join this network for their scenes because you can either get them elsewhere or they suck. **You will notice that TBP doesn't post one of their sites called horny thief tales. I don't know why but I can guess so I will simply say that they have 46 scenes, it's exclusif content and they are still updating with about 2 scenes per month. I've never actually downloaded any of their scenes so couldn't do an honest review anyway **young porn home videos is a site where I know that some of the content is leased because I recognize the scene. They have 84 scenes and the quality in most of them is bad to awfull. Most of the videos have an amateur feel to them with tripod only shots, night-vision cameras, bad lighting, fuzzy shots and so on. **young lesbian porn appears to be all leased content with 69 scenes to choose from. The scenes are next to impossible to review because the content is too ecletic, quality varies a lot and only 15 of the scenes have an accompanying video. **drilled mouths is appears to be an oral sex themed site with 46 scenes but where a large percentage of the girls also have sex with the guy so why call the sites makes no sense. Content appear to be partiallt leased and qulaity varies from scene to scene. **creampied sweeties is exactly what it sounds like. They have 40 scenes, some of them are probably leased and quality varies. **They have many other sites that could probably have been under one of two different site names but the recuring theme among all of them is that they are no longer updating, a lot of leased material, quality of the content varies a lot and most of the sites have very little content. ***I don't know if anyone should join the network for any of these sites because you might already have the content and even if you don't then you might not want it anyway. You should join the network for the active sites and use these as a bonus instead.*** My score is for the entire network and not based on these sites. Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (4) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 elephant (0) Nice review Pat, I've often been tempted to this site but none of the sites gets amazing reviews so just never have, I think for $19.99 or $24.99 I'd maybe check it out as a network but as you say, lots of the material is becoming dated these days with some of the sites not updating much and others stopped all together. 05-22-12  09:49am Reply To Message 2 pat362 (0) REPLY TO #1 - elephant : It's hard to tell if you would like the bulk of their content. If you aren't dead set on HD then you might go ahead but you should definetely avoid if you need HD. There is simply not enough HD on the entire network to warrant the join price. 05-22-12  10:20am Reply To Message 3 elephant (0) REPLY TO #2 - pat362 : Hi Pat, yeah I prefer HD these days but can survive it they are not too bad a quality. Must admit though looking through some of my very early movies the other day, mainly early Jordan Capri stuff and early Sapphic Erotica with Cindy, Angelique, Darlene, God I'd love to see these in HD, They are awesome movies cause they were the first internet porn models I got into but some of those vids do look rather crappy compared to todays standards, especially stuff from Jordan Capri, can you believe they 320 x 240 and were around 17mb. 05-27-12  12:47am Reply To Message 4 pat362 (0) REPLY TO #3 - elephant : I wish I could tell you that you will like the quality but I can't be certain because I'm really not that picky myself. 640x480 is more than an acceptable resolution for me. 05-27-12  05:47pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.