Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Dorsai6 (0)
|
It's been about a year and I rejoined Playboy Plus. They've finished moving all the material from the CyberClub and there is a lot to see. I still have one major complaint. About 25% of their photo sets consist of solo shots of more than one model. About 25% of these identify the models in each image, but the rest leave you to guess who is who. In the CyberClub nearly all the photos were identified by model. Since most of the unidentified images came from the CyberClub, I guess they just don't care to expend the effort.
|
07-07-13 03:09pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Dorsai6 (0)
|
One day later -- It seems I was wrong about the old content. They seem to be still moving older material from CyberClub to Playboy Plus. It the past two days I've noticed about 20 sets added with much older posting dates. I've also been checking some of the videos. In some cases, about a dozen so far, I've noticed that they've posted a 1990's video that was originally a 320 X 240 QuickTime movie as a 1920 X 1080 MP4. However, the new version seems to be the same as the old with no better resolution, but a much larger file. I can understand their wanting to post the old sets, some of them are great, but the higher resolution just wastes disk space and bandwidth.
|
07-08-13 08:02pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Dorsai6 (0)
|
Well its been another 10 months. There is more content, but it seems they are still moving old material. Some of the multi-model sets now identify the models image by image, but many do not. If you like Playboy as I do, this is a worthwhile site but I wish they'd get it finished and fully organized. Nearly all the videos are now 1080p.
|
05-23-14 12:20pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Dorsai6 (0)
|
It's been another year and I rejoined for the month. It seems they are done transferring material from the Cyber Club site. In the 11 months I was away, they have added about 500 new sets. Most of these sets include both photos and a video. All playmates from the first issue are now present including the actual gatefold image.
My only complaint is that they do not do a good job of identifying the model in a photo graph when a set includes photos of more than one model. About 1/3 of the time the set description had enough information to figure out the mode's name. The rest of the time it takes real work it identify each model.
I'm a regular. I like the models and I like the photography.
|
05-15-15 09:05pm
Reply To Message
|