| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Advent (0)
Webmaster
|
Thank you Messmer for your comments. I will send them to Kim, Matt and Luke right away. I know we had some issues with the ages but we are working on a filter that will solve that problem.
I do not have all of the answers for you right now but I want you to know that we are working on getting the site in good working order and we of course are listening to the members and future members.
I hope you will give us a shot to prove to you that we will take care of this site as we do our others. If you need anything just let me know.
Advent/Melissa
|
09-05-12 03:03pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Advent :
Thanks as always for your courteous response to some of my beefs, Melissa. This is exactly how I feel, that you are "still working on getting the site in good working order." I have started to look at it as a work in progress and, as I wrote, expect nothing but the best down the road.
However in the meantime, there are other glitches as well that I didn't mention: Yesterday I tried to create a custom zip .. in vain .. because I had to give up after five minutes of waiting. Trying to open a picture in High Resolution also took ages. Still having server problems?
But there is nothing but good will here so I just tell myself that you are busy fine tuning things and don't normally get irate over it.
I think my discontent behind the comment is, more than anything, rooted in my disappointment with the updates since ATK took over.
Not the quality so much, even though today's video disappointed me because it was so blurry, but because there has been nothing that even comes close to my favorite niche, which happens to be a nice leisurely strip out of more than just three - four items of clothing.
I somehow expected to see dresses and lots of lingerie and stockings etc. on mature women, yet most appear to dress like young girls .. casual and commando!
Anyway, I realize that's MY taste and if others like what's being presented then I'll lay off and let them have their fun without any more whining.
Thanks again for taking the time to reply.
|
09-05-12 06:51pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Advent (0)
Webmaster
|
REPLY TO #2 - messmer :
Hey Messmer I just wanted to give you a little more information.
We receive all of our content, including Aunt Judy's, in HD. We receive it via tape, disk and ftp.
All videos that go up on the sites with the exception of archives have a HD version.
mobile 852x480 @ 1mbps
SD 852x480 @ 2.2mbps
HD 1920x1080p @ 6mpbs
WMV 852x480 @ 2.2mpbs
852x480 is the resolution you see when you watch a DVD presented in widescreen.
Looking at our competitors, no others offer both true 1080p with such a high frame rate.
We get content from many different providers so depending on their own equipment movies will not look or feel the same from one model to the next.
We do not limit downloaders. We used too a couple years ago when we were with a different company but we are no longer with them so you should have no issues with us limiting how much you download. I am sure you have a good internet connection but that connection would be the only thing that would present limits to you.
I hope this gives you a little more information and as always I am here to answer any questions or concerns you have. I will also pass on your interest in lingerie and more slowly undressing.
|
09-10-12 08:36am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Advent :
Thanks,as always, Advent.
You are right I did not take into consideration that you receive your material from various providers when I wrote my complaint about a blurry 1080p video.
All the specifications were exactly as you described but the end result was not true HD, at least not to the eye. This videographer should be told to either adjust his focus or get himself a new camera or some software that allows him to sharpen a video after the fact. If there is such a thing.
I also agree with you about the matter of reducing speed during a download. It hasn't happened again and I've happily downloaded at my usual 2.34 MB/s.
The problems of navigating within the site were real enough, though. I've had an extremely slow server on more than one occasion.
Thanks again, and, as usual, it is a pleasure to be able to voice misgivings without a webmaster getting defensive over it. You are in the right spot. May they always keep you (if you are an employee rather than an owner) and give you regular raises!
|
09-10-12 11:53am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Advent (0)
Webmaster
|
REPLY TO #4 - messmer :
I am glad I was able to help. Thank you for the kind words, I am not an owner but I do love it here. I do not get upset over comments I just try to make sure that the information out there is correct.
I will be the first to admit when we have issues and make sure they get corrected. Thanks again Messmer, it has been a pleasure.
|
09-10-12 12:08pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Advent :
Just a parting remark, Advent: I have removed all references to the reducing speed in my comment. No answer required.
|
09-10-12 12:22pm
Reply To Message
|
