| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
You gave this site a high rating would you be able to share more of why you thought it was a high rating ?
Thanks
CT
|
10-11-12 01:18pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Monahan (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Cybertoad :
Ditto.
I have been a member for quite a while and would be most interested in the reasons for a 93 score.
Thanks.
|
10-12-12 10:25am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Hooliganzo (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Monahan :
Most of what I liked is already listed in the pros. The negatives were just nitpicking.
You can find big discounts for the site like the $65 annual offered here or $9.95 monthly which are a steal. I took the annual discount almost a year ago. Just from a price to content ratio, the site is worth it at the full price. The fact that you can subscribe at a 66% discount makes it a must especially with the high production value and content updates.
Aside from content site is well organized and the search is great. The amount of different models on this site is huge. Most I've seen in any site I've been to.
Like mentioned before the production value is high. The models have their hair and makeup done in a glamour fashion which I don't see in many other sites. The pictures are well shot, high resolution, crisp and full of color. There are no Jpeg compression artifacts like in some other sites.
Twistys live, while new and only updates once a month, is a nice addition on top of everything else. I always wanted to see something like this smiler to playboy night calls, Basically naked woman talking with some action at the end. Before that they had and still have model interviews which I also liked.
It is definitely a more generalist site with softcore and straight forward hardcore and no niches. Overall you usually don't get both quantity and quality and this site has both on top of a lot of diversity in its models.
|
10-15-12 07:24pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Monahan (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Hooliganzo :
Thanks Hooliganzo, for a great reply. It works as a "bottom line" commentary to your review.
I have relatively minor issues with the site's search function by criteria; for example, the cup sizes are not accurate, there is no search by natural/enhanced but there is a search by state (who really cares about state?), no search by soft core/hard core, no search by solo vs. G/G or B/G, etc.
I also give it an uptick for dating everything no matter how old, a clear indication of original content and a halfway decent discussion forum and a responsive webmaster who tries to be responsive to most comments.
|
10-15-12 10:25pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Hooliganzo (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Monahan :
The lack of search criteria for solo hardcore/sofcore etc is true but I usually go for Soft-core anyway so it was an issue I overlook.
I think the inaccuracies in cup sizes have to do with returning models who previously did not have implants returning to do more photo sets with them.
I would have liked to see a search criteria for implants and I did mention that some models have implants but overall it is a minor complaint for me.
|
10-16-12 08:17am
Reply To Message
|
