| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
1
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
|
01-03-14 02:44pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
2
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
fuzzyham's Reply
They may have changed it. I can't verify since my subscription expired more than a month ago.
When I was subscribed I did try and resume the failed downloads and they did not start. It only initiated when I went back to the site and added the link to the queue fresh from the website.
I would give the site 1 more point to my score if they did fix that issue.
|
01-03-13 12:09pm
|
Reply
3
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
fuzzyham's Reply
Yes, that is what I meant. I do use Downthemall. The reason I queue up downloads is because I don't want to be at my computer trying to manually download each file one at a time waiting for the the previous file to finish.
What you describe supports my theory that video download links expire if they are not actively used. So concurrent downloads would work but not queued up links that remain inactive until the previous download is finished.
The Problem with Concurrent downloads is that I don't want dozens of files downloading at the same time at a couple of kilobytes a second which takes longer to view anything. I like to download them in queue and watching them as the finish downloading.
|
01-02-13 11:39am
|
Reply
4
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
fuzzyham's Reply
The zipped picture sets downloaded for me fine with the a Download manager but the videos did not. Probably more to do with expiring links then the download manager itself. My guess is that if a link is not actively downloading it expires within the minute. So queuing videos up for download in the download manager would not be possible.
I had to download each video one by one without queuing them. When I try queuing the downloads, the first video and then stop downloading when it got to the second.
|
12-31-12 10:43pm
|
Comment
5
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
|
12-14-12 01:33pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
6
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Some sets are softcore like MET and some are more explicit.
There is a model by the name of Mosh but since they use pseudonyms or close sounding name I don't know if it the same model you want. This model has 5 sets, all are outdoors, and not explicit. Mostly just standing full frontal nudity.
If it is Miss Mosh from Deviant art with the pierced nipples then it is her.
|
12-13-12 06:07pm
|
Reply
7
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I like photos over video myself but I don't want people to get the wrong impression and think that there are just as many videos as photos.
|
12-12-12 06:18pm
|
Reply
8
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Since you asked, Teendreams.com.
I love the deals.
|
12-12-12 01:43pm
|
Review
9
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Good Quality photos high Resolution 2958x4000, sharp, well lit, rich color, high contrast. One of the best quality photos I've seen. Around 670 sets.
-Videos have the same quality as the photos. Videos range from 720p to 1080p. Later ones being 1080p. Around 60 videos
-Models look great. The way they are photographed and have their hair and makeup done make them look better then on other sites. Using Sara James as an example aka Ara on this site, a model I've seen on other sites like Nubiles, twistys, Alsscan. This site literally present models in their best light.
-Fantasy Theme is nice. The armor pieces and other costumes seem to look authentic. The overall theme gives the models more personality. |
| Cons: |
-Not many videos. Site is mainly Photos.
-The Site itself is not the best looking site in the world.
-Models have Pseudonyms.
-Links don't expire but there are times you have to reload the links when downloading. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is mainly a softcore photography site. There are some videos and photos with hardcore content. I would not say it is ultra softcore ie MET art because they do have models masturbating, and with closeup spreads although some photosets are that way.
The photos are some of the best quality I've seen. It would be great if they updated more then 12 times a month.
The videos are mostly masturbation scenes. A couple are hardcore. They usually consist of an intro of the model walking around or doing something . Then it goes into the solo action. Videos are accompanied by music which may not be a plus.
The only thing that is holding this site back is the amount of updates. It would be great if they had daily updates. The quality of the photos are great, rivaling and topping some more well known sites. If you like softcore Photography this site is definitely worth a try. |
|
12-12-12 10:29am
Replies (6)
|
Review
10
|
Digital Desire
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
12-01-12 02:09am (Update History)
Reason: Ran into another con.
|
| Pros: |
-2000x3000 resolution on latest photo sets
-Around 720 of those photosets are 3000px.
-Around 540 720p videos
-Interview videos
-updates once a day video every 5th update.
-Low price |
| Cons: |
-Older sets 1600x1024 or under.
-Around 1900 of the photosets are 1600px or under.
-Around 500 videos are 420p.
-Videos have music.
-Majority of pictures are in the outdoors with natural lighting which I'm not a fan of but is personal taste
-Video links expire when using download manager. Makes downloading videos exponentially time consuming. |
| Bottom Line: |
Based on the latest 3000px photos, technically the photo sets are well shot and composed. Personally I'm not a fan of the lighting. Most photosets are outdoors and most of the indoor sets have natural lighting from outside through the window. This might be a plus for some but for me it is not my style. I prefer the controlled lighting and indoor scenes.
Based on the latest 720p videos, the videos have a hazy dream sequence look to them. The videos have a music track to them. Both of which are not my style. Aside from that there are interviews with some of the models which are always a plus.
Search is done by broad categories hair color, breast type, shaved/unshaved, styles(wet,girlfriends, backstage, xxx stars etc). You can organize sets by publishing date or rating. There is also a checkbox for hd only so you only see 720p videos.
The models are more playboyesque type of models and they are photographed in that style. If you are looking for this style then this site is worth a try for the price offered. If you are looking for the amateur girl next door style this is not it. Whether or not you like this site depends on what style you like. |
|
11-30-12 10:46pm
Replies (9)
|
Reply
11
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
The lack of search criteria for solo hardcore/sofcore etc is true but I usually go for Soft-core anyway so it was an issue I overlook.
I think the inaccuracies in cup sizes have to do with returning models who previously did not have implants returning to do more photo sets with them.
I would have liked to see a search criteria for implants and I did mention that some models have implants but overall it is a minor complaint for me.
|
10-16-12 08:17am
|
Reply
12
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
The rate at which it updated when it still updated wasn't that great to begin with. That fact that they no longer have updates makes it worse.
The total amount content isn't that much. You can download everything in a couple of days. The 10 dollar comment is what I value all of its content.
The quality of content varied. The videos had interlacing issues and some of the photo sets were grainy which defeats the purpose of high resolution photos. The sets themselves didn't really stand out that much.
Some of the models are nice, but the videos are boring and poorly done.
Overall you can get the same style of content elsewhere with updates, better quality and more models. Limited content. Poor to average quality. The only real upside is that all of their photo sets are high resolution and there are some nice models.
|
10-15-12 07:44pm
|
Reply
13
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Most of what I liked is already listed in the pros. The negatives were just nitpicking.
You can find big discounts for the site like the $65 annual offered here or $9.95 monthly which are a steal. I took the annual discount almost a year ago. Just from a price to content ratio, the site is worth it at the full price. The fact that you can subscribe at a 66% discount makes it a must especially with the high production value and content updates.
Aside from content site is well organized and the search is great. The amount of different models on this site is huge. Most I've seen in any site I've been to.
Like mentioned before the production value is high. The models have their hair and makeup done in a glamour fashion which I don't see in many other sites. The pictures are well shot, high resolution, crisp and full of color. There are no Jpeg compression artifacts like in some other sites.
Twistys live, while new and only updates once a month, is a nice addition on top of everything else. I always wanted to see something like this smiler to playboy night calls, Basically naked woman talking with some action at the end. Before that they had and still have model interviews which I also liked.
It is definitely a more generalist site with softcore and straight forward hardcore and no niches. Overall you usually don't get both quantity and quality and this site has both on top of a lot of diversity in its models.
|
10-15-12 07:24pm
|
Review
14
|
Twistys
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Plenty of content.
-Multiple Daily updates. Video and Pictures
-Recent videos for the past year have had amazing quality. up to 1280x720. Clear crisp video
-Photos are available up to 2000x3000 after 2009.
-Twistys live. Live nude talk show between models.
-High quality photo sets.
-Plenty of models and diversity of models.
-Good production
-Hair on models styled in glamour fashion.
-Hardcore and Softcore
-Has a great search feature.
-Low cost for premium content |
| Cons: |
-Some older sets and videos are poor quality but these date back to 2003 so I don't hold that against them.
-Not a fan of implants and some models have them but that is just personal preference. |
| Bottom Line: |
Just on price alone and the content it offers I would definitely recommend this site. |
|
10-11-12 11:51am
Replies (5)
|
Review
15
|
LSG Models
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some photo sets are good.
-All sets are high resolution 2000x3000
-Videos are 1280x720 |
| Cons: |
-Video quality is not very good and the videos are poorly directed. Ultra softcore.
-Videos have interlacing issues.
-Videos are dubbed with music.
-Some photosets are grainy.
-No updates. Last update was in 03/10/12. Before that date updates were weekly.
-Limited content. |
| Bottom Line: |
The amount of content offered for the 4 years this site has been running would have been covered in a couple of months of updates on other sites.
For the amount of content I would say this website worth it for a one time payment of $10. Since they no longer update and their updates were slow before that. It is definitely not a site I would recommend a subscription to for more than a month. |
|
10-11-12 11:18am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
16
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
Sets after around 2007 offer the 1500x1000 zips. I think it is the bare minimum for good resolutions. I use my tv as a monitor which I run at 1920x1080. Images in full screen at this resolution on a 40 inch tv look good. The older sets look decent between 2004-07. The sets 2003 and before are pretty poor.
If you like to zoom in you can zoom in a little with the 1500 sets and still look good.
|
10-24-11 12:14pm
|
