| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Comment
from littlejoe:
i bought a visa vanilla card to use on this site. it would not take the number tho. after my 2nd failed attempt i was sent to epoch as a alternative biller, which u can easily cancel with. so keep that in mind if u wanna avoid the playboy billing
|
10-29-14 07:37pm
|
Reply
2
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Comment
from slutty:
I know this is an old comment, but figured I'd add a response in case someone else was curious.
They have 3D videos, it is side-by-side video encoding, the quality is not so great, and clearly they are not using the best equipment, but it can be entertaining. There are quite a few videos on 3D, maybe like 500, the majority of which is HC with some solo and lesbian. The main problem I have with it (aside from encoding quality) is that they are using wmv, which is not supported on my 3D TV so I have to re-encode everything in mp4.
|
03-16-14 02:46am
|
Reply
3
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Comment
from Drooler:
I'll have to toss in my 2 bits on this, too, in agreement with the others that the live phone call cancellation requirement was a put off. The rep who answered was female and had a nice sexy voice and was very polite, but that was also part of what unnerved me. I was firm about cancelling and she didn't put up much resistance, but I also felt kind of sorry for her, doing that kind of work.
And I haven't rejoined since, either, which means 2-3 years ago. Playboy seems to try to do things a different way sometimes -- maybe it's part of their branding concept -- but this aspect of it is a mistake.
|
01-05-14 12:20pm
|
Reply
4
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Comment
from pat362:
Fair warning to anyone looking to join anything with the name Playboy because I joined their main site a few years ago and I had to do the same thing to cancel. That's why I will never join another Playboy site.
|
01-04-14 10:31am
|
Reply
5
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Comment
from rearadmiral:
Having to call someone to cancel is a deal-breaker for me. I wouldn't join this site for that reason alone. Thanks for the warning.
|
01-04-14 09:34am
|
Reply
6
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Comment
from cjd2004:
From the video playback page on the Penthouse site:
"If you have a pair of red/cyan 3d glasses select "red/cyan" from the menu.
For those without glasses you can try the cross-eyed or parallel views where you use your eyes to focus in front of or behind the video and align the two images in your field of view.
Members with a 3D enabled computer system can download the 3D version for playback on their system."
Also it seems that 3D versions are only SD.
|
02-17-13 07:48pm
|
Reply
7
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from fuzzyham:
(Hooliganzo's Reply)
Just tried it and it seemed to work ok for me. I started one video and made sure it was running. I then queued up a second video and made sure it was not running. When the first video finished (elapse time approx 20 minutes), the second video started up right away.
In the Network tab of the DownThemAll preferences, my settings are:
Concurrent Downloads - set to 1 (Set this way just for the test)
Automatic retries - set to 5 min (I think this is the default)
Max. Retries - set to 10 (set this way for the test)
Couldn't find much in the way of help on-line for these settings, but what may be happening is this: If your auto-retries and max-retries expire before the first video ends, it may not start the second video. Don't know how long it takes you to download a video but try setting those 2 switches so they exceed that time frame. Also, there is a menu option (and hot-key combo) to force start a video, which may be another option (just right-click the video you want to start). I may have time to test my theory but not for a while, so give what I suggest a try and let me know.
|
01-03-13 06:21am
|
Reply
8
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from fuzzyham:
(Hooliganzo's Reply)
If by queuing you mean setting them up so that when one finishes the next one starts, I've never tried this. I usually do one at a time. However, if I start one, then start another, then they will run concurrently without problems. I'm using a FireFox add-in called DownThemAll! Works great. I'll try the queue thing sometime and let you know.
Happy New Year.
|
01-01-13 07:27am
|
Reply
9
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from fuzzyham:
From a value-per-dollar perspective, this is one of my favorite sites. I love the videos. Well shot and the girls look comfortable and relaxed and really seem to be enjoying themselves. The pics are good from a quality perspective but I don't like the format the thumbnails are presented in. I also don't like that the pics and videos are mixed together and are not in date order when you look at a models portfolio. I do like that when I emailed them to suggest some layout changes that they replied the next day saying that they would investigate. Nothing happened, so I'm not sure they really took a serious look but at least they responded.
I always download from this site using FireFox with a download manager and have never had any problems.
|
12-31-12 12:08pm
|
Reply
10
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from otoh:
(Hooliganzo's Reply)
Many thanks for the reply - I was indeed speaking of the very same Miss Mosh. She is my absolute favourite model - the only one I really specifically follow (even though I know she only does very softcore images) - so this site has gone up a notch or two.
|
12-14-12 03:29am
|
Reply
11
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from otoh:
Thanks for the review on this site which is sort of on my radar - it's especially good to know that it's not quite a softcore (some may say insipid) as eg Met Art. I'm also tempted here because I think there are some sets of Mosh, one of my favourite models - if you are still a member, can you check how many? Thanks!
|
12-12-12 10:14pm
|
Reply
12
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from Capn:
Not many videos is not a con for photo folk ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-12-12 04:01pm
|
Reply
13
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Nubiles Captain:
(Hooliganzo's Reply)
I am working on that one right now. They are in the middle of changing some administration on theire side around so as soon as they finish it, I will push to get it done.
|
12-12-12 01:46pm
|
Reply
14
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from gaypornolover:
Very good first review have added you to Trust List and hope you stick around!
|
12-03-12 03:32pm
|
Reply
15
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from Cybertoad:
Really nice review keep up the good work.
|
12-03-12 12:56pm
|
Reply
16
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from tangub:
Good review Hooliganzo, can't really disagree with anything you wrote there. Personally I love their style of photography with the natural light and it's a site i'm likely to return to time and time again as long as it stays at the great value for money price of $10.
|
12-02-12 01:43am
|
Reply
17
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(Hooliganzo's Reply)
Thanks Hooliganzo, for a great reply. It works as a "bottom line" commentary to your review.
I have relatively minor issues with the site's search function by criteria; for example, the cup sizes are not accurate, there is no search by natural/enhanced but there is a search by state (who really cares about state?), no search by soft core/hard core, no search by solo vs. G/G or B/G, etc.
I also give it an uptick for dating everything no matter how old, a clear indication of original content and a halfway decent discussion forum and a responsive webmaster who tries to be responsive to most comments.
|
10-15-12 10:25pm
|
Reply
18
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from Cybertoad:
You gave this site a high rating would you be able to share more of why you thought it was a high rating ?
Thanks
CT
|
10-11-12 01:18pm
|
Reply
19
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
from Cybertoad:
Your rating on Twistys and this site were far apart.
Did you base your very low rating on the fact the content is no longer updated ?
As over all it seemed you liked the site just not the content limits but praised it for being worth a one time of 10.00 sorry the review kinda confused me a bit.
|
10-11-12 01:16pm
|
Reply
20
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from monty4321:
(Hooliganzo's Reply)
thanks guys this was of great help.
|
10-31-11 03:11pm
|
