Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Good Quality photos high Resolution 2958x4000, sharp, well lit, rich color, high contrast. One of the best quality photos I've seen. Around 670 sets.
-Videos have the same quality as the photos. Videos range from 720p to 1080p. Later ones being 1080p. Around 60 videos
-Models look great. The way they are photographed and have their hair and makeup done make them look better then on other sites. Using Sara James as an example aka Ara on this site, a model I've seen on other sites like Nubiles, twistys, Alsscan. This site literally present models in their best light.
-Fantasy Theme is nice. The armor pieces and other costumes seem to look authentic. The overall theme gives the models more personality. |
| Cons: |
-Not many videos. Site is mainly Photos.
-The Site itself is not the best looking site in the world.
-Models have Pseudonyms.
-Links don't expire but there are times you have to reload the links when downloading. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is mainly a softcore photography site. There are some videos and photos with hardcore content. I would not say it is ultra softcore ie MET art because they do have models masturbating, and with closeup spreads although some photosets are that way.
The photos are some of the best quality I've seen. It would be great if they updated more then 12 times a month.
The videos are mostly masturbation scenes. A couple are hardcore. They usually consist of an intro of the model walking around or doing something . Then it goes into the solo action. Videos are accompanied by music which may not be a plus.
The only thing that is holding this site back is the amount of updates. It would be great if they had daily updates. The quality of the photos are great, rivaling and topping some more well known sites. If you like softcore Photography this site is definitely worth a try. |
|
12-12-12 10:29am
Replies (6)
|
Review
2
|
Digital Desire
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
12-01-12 02:09am (Update History)
Reason: Ran into another con.
|
| Pros: |
-2000x3000 resolution on latest photo sets
-Around 720 of those photosets are 3000px.
-Around 540 720p videos
-Interview videos
-updates once a day video every 5th update.
-Low price |
| Cons: |
-Older sets 1600x1024 or under.
-Around 1900 of the photosets are 1600px or under.
-Around 500 videos are 420p.
-Videos have music.
-Majority of pictures are in the outdoors with natural lighting which I'm not a fan of but is personal taste
-Video links expire when using download manager. Makes downloading videos exponentially time consuming. |
| Bottom Line: |
Based on the latest 3000px photos, technically the photo sets are well shot and composed. Personally I'm not a fan of the lighting. Most photosets are outdoors and most of the indoor sets have natural lighting from outside through the window. This might be a plus for some but for me it is not my style. I prefer the controlled lighting and indoor scenes.
Based on the latest 720p videos, the videos have a hazy dream sequence look to them. The videos have a music track to them. Both of which are not my style. Aside from that there are interviews with some of the models which are always a plus.
Search is done by broad categories hair color, breast type, shaved/unshaved, styles(wet,girlfriends, backstage, xxx stars etc). You can organize sets by publishing date or rating. There is also a checkbox for hd only so you only see 720p videos.
The models are more playboyesque type of models and they are photographed in that style. If you are looking for this style then this site is worth a try for the price offered. If you are looking for the amateur girl next door style this is not it. Whether or not you like this site depends on what style you like. |
|
11-30-12 10:46pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
3
|
Twistys
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Plenty of content.
-Multiple Daily updates. Video and Pictures
-Recent videos for the past year have had amazing quality. up to 1280x720. Clear crisp video
-Photos are available up to 2000x3000 after 2009.
-Twistys live. Live nude talk show between models.
-High quality photo sets.
-Plenty of models and diversity of models.
-Good production
-Hair on models styled in glamour fashion.
-Hardcore and Softcore
-Has a great search feature.
-Low cost for premium content |
| Cons: |
-Some older sets and videos are poor quality but these date back to 2003 so I don't hold that against them.
-Not a fan of implants and some models have them but that is just personal preference. |
| Bottom Line: |
Just on price alone and the content it offers I would definitely recommend this site. |
|
10-11-12 11:51am
Replies (5)
|
Review
4
|
LSG Models
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some photo sets are good.
-All sets are high resolution 2000x3000
-Videos are 1280x720 |
| Cons: |
-Video quality is not very good and the videos are poorly directed. Ultra softcore.
-Videos have interlacing issues.
-Videos are dubbed with music.
-Some photosets are grainy.
-No updates. Last update was in 03/10/12. Before that date updates were weekly.
-Limited content. |
| Bottom Line: |
The amount of content offered for the 4 years this site has been running would have been covered in a couple of months of updates on other sites.
For the amount of content I would say this website worth it for a one time payment of $10. Since they no longer update and their updates were slow before that. It is definitely not a site I would recommend a subscription to for more than a month. |
|
10-11-12 11:18am
Replies (2)
|
|
