| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Capn (0)
|
Just about every site does that, so it doesn't surprise me that they are following the trend.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-20-13 05:45am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
You know, I really hate to be disagreeable, but I think adding toys to FemJoy would be a very, very bad idea. There are PLENTY of, as in MUCHO, to say nothing of BEAUCOUP de places in Pornland for toy lovers to get their kicks. Some of us are different in that way, and I'm one of them.
I hate toys!!! I remember when Nubiles started adding toy play. It RUINED the site as far as I'm concerned.
There have to be sites where toys are simply OUT. Please understand.
|
01-20-13 05:49am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
KET924aab (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :
Valid point Drooler, and I get what you're saying. I prefer to watch a girl masturbate with her fingers, but I like occasional toy use, especially with glass dildos and those clear plastic ones like this model was using. And I much prefer when they hold the toy by reaching under their thigh. I doubt that Femjoy will go overboard with it, and I agree with you that many sites do.
|
01-20-13 06:07am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
tangub (0)
|
Let's hope it's a one off and they don't start going down that road. I've not joined Femjoy yet although it's high on my priorities but the thing that annoys me looking at the tour is that they don't have a decent mid size photo option around 2000px. Their mid size is only 1200px which will look pathetic on my 24 inch monitor so I'm going to be forced to use up extra bandwidth and storage space downloading their 4000px sets when I would be quite happy with 2000px photos like I get from Met, Mpl or W4B.
|
01-20-13 06:09am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #4 - tangub :
I've been a FemJoy member a few times, and they've done a lot to improve the site, but your suggestion is actually the next thing they need to do. 1200 pixels just doesn't cut it anymore, and 2000 would do it fine, along with larger option, which is most often 4000 px, though it can get up to 5500 px once in a while.
|
01-20-13 07:11am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :
You got understandig here, bro......Femjoy is - or now was - a site with generally NO toys - sad it's changed.
|
01-20-13 08:00am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :
I always preferred Metart over Femjoy. I certainly don't look at every photoset, and I skip most Metart videos without looking at them because I've found very few videos at Metart that I really like, no matter how much I might like their models.
But I haven't noticed any toys at Metart recently. I'm currently a Metart member.
If I do find a Metart photoset with toys, I will try to post this warning to the PU site.
|
01-20-13 09:12am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #7 - lk2fireone :
I haven't seen any toys atMetArt either, which is why I like, too. And they've wisely decided to satisfy those who crave the toy insertions (human and otherwise) by creating the sister site SexArt, leaving MetArt free of the phallic probes.
So if FemJoy were to go that route and come up with a "ToyJoy," that would be fine with me. I mean, doesn't the world need yet another? ;)
|
01-20-13 01:07pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
cjd2004 (0)
|
REPLY TO #8 - Drooler :
They already have that - JoyMii.
|
01-23-13 12:23am
Reply To Message
|
10
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #9 - cjd2004 :
Why, yes! Funny, I hadn't noticed the connection. Well, it isn't as though they've cornered the "joy" market. ;) Thanks for pointing that out.
|
01-25-13 05:00pm
Reply To Message
|
