| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
Another excellent informative review. This is a borderline join for me, and it's still borderline, but thanks to your review I have more idea of what I'm spending money on.
|
01-08-14 10:26am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
Great review pat. Like you, I try not to let my subjective opinions cloud an objective review. I may not like the porn on offer, but if the scenes are good, the site is well laid out and the downloads are simple then the site still deserves to be credited for that. Where we differ on this site is that I really liked the scenes here. I haven't rejoined yet, but I will.
(And I guess we also disagree that facials have no place in glamour porn. I still think they do but agree that a facial doesn't need to be the only ending to a scene.)
|
01-08-14 01:55pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - rearadmiral :
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on facials because I believe that it's impossible to shoot a glamorous facial. The act itself prohibits the possibility that it can be glamorous. Of course that has not stopped these people from shooting them and I suspect that enough members like them to make them comeback.
I'm just glad that there is one site that still likes to show people kissing and guys going down on their lady friends
|
01-08-14 05:59pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :
While we may disagree on facials (and I don't want them for every glamour scene), we certainly agree on kissing and men going down on ladies. I was watching a recently uploaded Maddy O'Reilly scene from EroticaX a couple of nights ago and the male talent goes down on Maddy and two things struck me: 1) how rare it is for me to see that these days, and 2) how incredibly hot it is to see (when shot right). I was also struck with the though that this would be a great job for a fella!
|
01-09-14 02:02pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
sonofzog (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :
I'm totally with you on facials (and for that matter, on money shots in general). Like most porn fans, I enjoy video that plays into my own fantasies about sex and beautiful women. Of all the lovers I've had over the years, from marriage to one-night stands, I never felt a desire to come on her face, and I'm reasonably sure it would never have been received graciously. I have always preferred internal release regardless of orifice.
The whole cliche of shooting onto a woman's back or belly or face is an archaic throwback to porn producers who wanted to prove that it was real screwing with a real ejaculation. I'm pretty sure we've gotten past that but I still see many comments from those who want to see a huge load on the woman's face. Don't get, never will.
|
03-14-14 09:33am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - sonofzog :
The two reasons why I think cum shots came to be was because old time directors needed to prove that the guy had an orgasm and since men can't really fake it then showing a cum shot was the only way. The other reason is a little weird but it would appear that it's not that unusual for female porn performers to be less than wise when it comes to birth control so an internal cum shot is a little dangerous for these women.
I'd be just as happy if the guys wore a condom and made an internal cum shot or if they just faked it. After all we don't pretend to have an orgasm and then take out our dicks to shoot cum near the vagina or ass of our significant other so why does porn have to do that?
|
03-14-14 09:57am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Abel Semen (0)
|
"*Sorry but facials should never be included in glamorous porn because there's nothing glamorous about shooting cum all over the face of the woman you had sex with since there's no way you are going to kiss that mouth and obviously neither do the guys in these videos."
It may not be a surprise given my nick, but I couldn't disagree more. Facials are, for my money, easily the most visually interesting element of mainstream porn (on the average), and it constantly frustrates me that otherwise high-quality "glamour" sites tend not to include them.
And, post-facial kissing is very much a thing, and one that if anything I wouldn't mind seeing more of. Seems only fair on the part of the guy if he wants/expects his girl to take it in face. I don't want it in every scene, but it would be a good occasional inclusion, *especially* in scenes with a bit more of a romantic feel.
|
03-24-14 07:37pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #7 - Abel Semen :
I never said that people didn't like them but only that facials can't be considered glamorous. The act of ejaculating on a girls face is not one that I would call respectful and it's certainly not something you do to a person you adore. I equal facials with spitting in the face and no one likes to get spit in the face. I don't care what you have read or heard from porn performers in regards to cum shot to the face but none of them enjoy getting sperm all over their face and they certainly don't like it in their eyes. It's just that they know that a certain percentage of fans like yourself like them and they try to sell the fantasy. That's why glamour sites can't do facials because facials never equal glamorous no matter how good the camera operator is.
You'll have to give me the names of the movies where you saw post facial kissing between the man and the woman because I can't think of one where I have seen it. That's not to say they don't exist but strangely enough guys don't want to eat their own sperm.
|
03-25-14 06:36pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Twotails (0)
|
REPLY TO #8 - pat362 :
I find the end of Kim - "Do Me Darling" very glamorous, with that sort of kissing we're looking for - perfect :D
|
07-18-15 03:37pm
Reply To Message
|
