| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
Not something I ever watch or get into, tad over the top for my taste.
|
04-20-14 12:02am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
svagebeast (0)
|
I find fisting sometimes interesting to watch but not eager to try it myself.
|
04-20-14 02:04am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
Please allow me to expand on the option: "pretty disgusting."
I also find it repulsive, repelling, offensive, repugnant, revolting, slimy, degrading, putrid, despicable, sordid, foul, abhorrent, demeaning.
Vile, sickening .... and whatever else one can think of that would be synonymous with any of the above.
|
04-20-14 04:19am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Capn (0)
|
What G said :0/
|
04-20-14 05:06am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
I once met a girl in New Orleans who asked me to do it back in the 80s. Interesting but didn't do much for me.
|
04-20-14 08:03am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Fisting: Some girls love it. Anal: Some girls love that, too.
Makes you wonder why it's always the men who get called perverts. LOL
I suppose that if I were "fistable" in such a way that I might be more favorably inclined. BTW, shouldn't there be a porn flick called "A Fistful for Dollars"?
Just wondering ...
|
04-20-14 09:00am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
Now & again extreme stuff is interesting, but gets old fast.
A wide variety of content is best and no one sexual act repeated over & over will ever be interesting to me.
|
04-20-14 10:12am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Monahan (0)
|
Interesting poll question.
My first encounter with fisting was way back when (late 70's), when I saw Taxi Girls in a "Pussycat Theatre" here in LA. In a sex scene in a jail, one of the babes got fisted and my reaction at the time was, why was that done, and, boy, it must hurt.
Then when it was available on videotape, I rented it because I was (am still) in love with Ms. Suiter, wherever she may be) and noticed that the fisting element was no longer there. I assumed that fisting violated some new standard set by the industry that made fisting out of bounds. In fact I remember a scene a long time ago where in a lesbian scene the director said to one girl to make sure she keeps her thumb outside as she stuck the other four fingers firmly inside her partner's cunt.
A few decades later When the web started providing access to more and to more varied forms of porn, these "standards" such as they are, seem to have disappeared and now fisting, and other presumably taboo stuff (like pissing and scat) can be found routinely.
End of history lesson.
My answer is "OK now and then." Fisting itself does nothing for me, but the use of multiple fingers to give a babe's pussy a heavy duty workout is hot stuff.
|
04-20-14 10:21am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #8 - Monahan :
I second everything you wrote and add that fisting on VHS and DVD is a grey area. The only producer that I'm aware who mistakenly left fisting in one of his movies was Seymore Butts and as luck would have it he was charged with producing obscene material in California. The case was all set to go to trial but he pleaded no contest and paid a fine. Needless to say no one wanted to push the limits after that.
That's not to say that fisting was not shot before and after that but usually the scene is either nowhere to be found or in the case of dvd it's often in the bonus or BTS section.
|
04-20-14 10:41am
Reply To Message
|
10
|
LPee23 (0)
|
I don't go looking for it, but I don't mind it either. There's enough around online though, including 5 fingers, but maybe less on DVD.
By the way, the 4 vs 5 finger fisting distinction came from British obscenity law. 5-finger fisting is considered extreme porn in the UK and a criminal offense. 4-finger fisting is OK in the UK though.
|
04-20-14 04:19pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
BenThruston (0)
|
Guess ok now and then. Tend to like some fisting scenes in European vids can't easily get here in US, but then I'm a fan of gapes and stretching anyway.
Little interest in g/g fisting vids though, depending on scene setup, and not really into fisting being the sole focus of a video or site.
|
04-21-14 03:06pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
turboshaft (0)
|
REPLY TO #9 - pat362 :
Sucks that Seymore had to waste his time and money on that case, especially considering that there was plenty of this and even harder content on American sites by then, but apparently DVDs are sacred media.
I seem to remember reading that most of the jury who had to watch the offending scene at trial--you know, "evidence"--were more bored than offended, plus it's something you have to seek out to really get all worked up about. Of course that's how so many of the concerned moralists of the world work; leaving no stone unturned until at least one fragile person finds something offensive.
|
04-21-14 03:12pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #12 - turboshaft :
I think prosecutors went after Seymore for only one reason and it's because he was a well known porn producer at that time so it was sure to get a lot of press. I can't speak for what was on the net at that time because I certainly wasn't but fisting on the net is a very different thing than fisting on VHS or DVD. if it wasn't then Kink's Everything Butt would have been charged a long time ago.
|
04-21-14 05:35pm
Reply To Message
|
