Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

Does High-Def show too many minor skin flaws to be a turn-on?

Type: Content

Submitted by Khan (0)
No, I don't notice the flaws 21% 6 Votes
No, flaws make it realistic 55% 16 Votes
Sometimes too much detail 17% 5 Votes
Yes, the flaws are distracting 7% 2 Votes
Other (see reply) 0% 0 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

29 Votes Total

Apr 9, 2015

Poll Replies (8)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

RustyJ (Suspended) I found out that on some sites like 21Sextury it tends to bring out way too much detail like skin flaws, hair roots and so on. Maybe others use some filtering or just make up? Photos especially are almost always retouched.
04-09-15  07:47am

Reply To Message

2

Loki (0) I don't mind it one bit. I'm not exactly downloading porn to look at skin flaws anyway, if you catch my drift.
04-09-15  10:57am

Reply To Message

3

graymane (Suspended) I suppose if I could tear myself away from fixations on tits, ass, thighs and pussies long enough to gather an overall assessment of what I otherwise might see elsewhere..... I then just might have my answer to this intriguing poll inquiry.
But alas. What else can I say?

04-09-15  02:26pm

Reply To Message

4

pinkerton (0) I once saw a 1080p clip where just before the money shot, I could see an angry red zit near the lady's clit, if the video wasn't in HD I doubt it would've been noticed. The same goes for a close up of a rather diseased looking cock near the girl's face.
04-09-15  03:41pm

Reply To Message

5

Drooler (Disabled) I don't notice the flaws -- unless they're there. "Skin flaws" fits the question, but there are many kinds, some inconsequential and some not. It doesn't happen often, but I've been grossed out by the details of a few girls and really changed my mind about them once they were under the HD macroscope.

And I'm not into porn for "realism." It's the stuff of fantasy. Surgical scars from tit jobs, pimply butts, and some birth marks are sometimes just too real to take.

04-09-15  04:39pm

Reply To Message

6

pat362 (0) The question is somewhat ambiguous so maybe my answer will not apply but here goes what I have to say. HD is a scourge to me because too many scenes are ruined when I can see all the razor burns and pimples a performer has on her ass or around her vagina. It's less so when they are acne or just normal skin flaws.
04-09-15  05:35pm

Reply To Message

7

LPee23 (0) Not at all, HD is amazing. Minor skin flaws like moles and skin lines are not a turn off. Actually, I love the realism of HD, especially in close ups.

I can not wait for the next level up in resolution. As good as today's HD is, it is still far from reproducing the detail we see in reality.

04-09-15  06:24pm

Reply To Message

8

skippy (0) A few of my favorite models are total stunners but have tiny scars in one place or another (i.e. leg or knee). By looking for and finding the scars, I can tell whether the images are PhotoShopped. Same with moles. No moles at all? Probably shopped.
05-21-15  09:13pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.