| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
jazzbard73 (0)
|
To me, adding a tattoo to an already gorgeous woman is the same as taking a beautiful painting by Vincent van Gogh and drawing on it with ink to try to improve it. A beautiful sexy woman is great the way she is. Let her sensuality and beauty shine forth undimmed.
|
06-26-15 02:59am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Monahan (0)
|
A few tasteful tats (see, for example, Jana Jordan with a few small ones on her feet and Anastasia Christ with her one small butterfly above her fabulously gorgeous right breast) are OK.
But what annoys the bejeebers out of me are the babes that cover their whole arm or leg or neck with ink and destroy a gorgeous body.
|
06-26-15 10:29am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
skippy (0)
|
I think this may be a case of different strokes for different folks, but I do get pretty disappointed when I see a really beautiful, pristine model with a new, blatantly obvious tattoo. Example: Melena Morgan pre-tattoos? Awesomely beautiful. Malena Morgan with tattoos? Either clearly branded as a porn star or spending a lot of time on the softer sites covering them up.
A lot of these girls don't realize that they are their own canvas. It is what makes them so amazing. The minute they agree to be somebody else's canvas, it takes some, sometimes ALL, of that amazing away. Or maybe to put it more directly...when have you ever heard anyone say "That girl was hot before but that new tattoo makes her look even better!" Yup....never.
|
06-26-15 06:09pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Skippy said it well, and I agree with Monahan about the "whole arm or leg or neck" problem. Monique Alexander, for example, has clearly overdone it. I still think she's hot, but I've had to take the bad with the good.
And maybe the girls thinking that they are their own canvas is where the whole problem got its start.
|
06-27-15 01:17am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
nineinch (0)
|
I figure there is rivalry among porn stars to have the best tatoos. But when large areas of their body are completely covered it seem like they are more interested in winning tatoo competitions than in serving their porn customers. I suppose they could do both, but it takes a bit for me to get used to.
Also, some women seem to do it for porn marketing. I forget who it was, but the first time I saw gift wrapping ribbons on a girl's legs I thought she was making herself more of an object of desire.
I would take an arm full of tats over fake boobs, any day. But I would rather see a tongue, nipple or clit post over either.
|
06-27-15 06:36am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
pat362 (0)
|
The size and location of the tattoo or tattoos are the two most important reason why I may not be able to enjoy a performer. I'm usually okay with one or two hard to see tattoos or not too garish ones but if the performer has a sleeve or a huge tattoo than there is a good chance that I won't be able to enjoy her because my eyes will keep looking at the tattoo. It's significantly worse if the performer decides to get body art once she is established because than it is a dramatic change in appearance that I can almost never overlook.
|
06-27-15 07:15pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
elephant (0)
|
I will never understand tattoos, just awful and so sad to see on any girl. Never seen it improve anyone and taking away your beauty with ugly ink permanently ruining what was gorgeous female and feminine body. Also I find tattoos too masculine so seeing women with them isn't a thing I'm into.
|
06-28-15 05:51am
Reply To Message
|
