| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Pyrenees (0)
|
I am not the best reviewer. But I do not find any part in particular difficult. The review is simply a reflection of my experience on the website. It almost writes itself.
I will tell you something I would like to see. I would like to see the top 10 reviews of websites count. I mean assuming a website does not go suddenly bad. Or suddenly drastically improve. I see a lot of GREAT older reviews that are very much helpful today. But they do not get counted and that is a shame.
|
08-13-15 12:58am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Pyrenees :
I agree that older reviews can be very useful. In many cases, there just are not enough new reviews.
|
08-13-15 05:29am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
Although I check it doesn't matter, I should qualify that. When reviewing a weak website, it may be hard to find pros and the bottom line may not have much to say either. I find reviews of weak sites to end up as short.
|
08-13-15 05:49pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
pat362 (0)
|
I usually find the bottom line to be the hardest part because I keep having to edit down as much as possible my rambling so that the reader knows what I'm trying to say without having to read through twelve lines of dialogue.
|
08-13-15 06:36pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
LPee23 (0)
|
The score is the hardest. Many factors have to be weighed to come up with a comprehensive score.
|
08-14-15 03:55pm
Reply To Message
|
